Peirce's summum bonum and the ethical views of C. I. Lewis and John Dewey
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59 (4):1029-1037 (1999)
| Abstract | I am primarily concerned here with C. I. Lewis's suggestion in a letter to me that some admitted defects in his ethical views might be removed by appealing to Peirce's views on the summum bonum, which Peirce identified as the evolutionary process whereby the universe becomes more and more orderly. Since Lewis held in his published writings that what is morally obligatory can never be determined by empirical facts alone, I argue that since the alleged growing orderliness of the universe must be established empirically, Lewis cannot analyze an obligatory action as one that contributes to that process without abandoning his view that obligatoriness cannot be established empirically. I also argue that if Lewis were to abandon his opposition to a naturalistic theory of obligation, appealing to Peirce's summum bonum would not help Lewis out of what he called his predicament in ethics | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,653 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesMichael Lebuffe (2005). Spinoza's Summum Bonum. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 86 (2):243–266.
Henry Sturt (1900). The Doctrine of the Summum Bonum: A Criticism. Mind 9 (35):372-383.
Daniel Greenleaf Thompson (1881). Iv. —The Summum Bonum. Mind (21):62-81.
Daniel Greenleaf Thompson (1881). The Summum Bonum. Mind 6 (21):62-81.
James Seth (1896). Is Pleasure the Summum Bonum? International Journal of Ethics 6 (4):409-424.
Francisco Salto & José M. Méndez (1999). Two Extensions of Lewis' S3 with Peirce's Law. Theoria 14 (3):407-411.
Joel Isaac (2006). Why Not Lewis? Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 42 (1):54-60.
John Greco (2006). How to Be a Pragmatist: C. I. Lewis and Humean Skepticism. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 42 (1):24-31.
Fritz-Joachim von Rintelen (1977). O Bonum E o Summum Bonum No Pensamento de Tomás de Aquino. Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 33 (2/3):182 - 195.
Martin Lefebvre (2007). Peirce's Esthetics: A Taste for Signs in Art. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 43 (2):319-344.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads5 ( #160,204 of 548,984 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
