David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 85 (1):177-202 (2011)
The problem of doctrinal development, first formulated by John Henry Newman, is usually assumed to be a distinctly modern theological issue, since itoriginates in modern scholarly history and its application to problems of doctrine. My thesis, in contrast, is that St. Bonaventure’s theology of history as presentedin his Hexaemeron is also a theory of doctrinal development—though it appears some six hundred years prior to Newman’s Essay on the Development of Christian Doctrine. I begin by discussing the relationship between theology of history and doctrinal development, from which I conclude Bonaventure’s theology of history is a theory of doctrinal development. Secondly, I discuss Bonaventure’s theory and how he uses it to justify the mendicant and Franciscan ways of life. Finally, I develop elements of Cardinal Newman’s theory as points for comparison and evaluation of Bonaventure’s theory
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
John R. White (2009). Doctrinal Development and the Philosophy of History. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 83 (2):201-218.
Paul G. Crowley (2000). Rahner, Doctrine and Ecclesial Pluralism. Philosophy and Theology 12 (1):131-154.
Gerard McCarren (2004). Are Newman's “Tests” or “Notes” of Genuine Doctrinal Development Useful Today? Newman Studies Journal 1 (2):48-61.
Andrew Tallon (2003). Doctrinal Development and Wisdom. Philosophy and Theology 15 (2):353-383.
T. J. Mashburn (1988). The Categories of Development an Overlooked Aspect of Newman's Theory of Doctrinal Development. Heythrop Journal 29 (1):33–43.
Dermot Cassidy (2013). The Logical Deduction of Doctrine. Heythrop Journal 54 (2):203-213.
John R. White (2008). Divine Light and Human Wisdom: Transcendental Elements in Bonaventure's Illumination Theory. International Philosophical Quarterly 48 (2):175-185.
Benjamin John King (2009). Newman and the Alexandrian Fathers: Shaping Doctrine in Nineteenth-Century England. Oxford University Press.
Walter J. Burghardt (1987). The Face of Theology 1986. Philosophy and Theology 2 (1):3-19.
Christopher M. Cullen (2005). Bonaventure. Oxford University Press.
Adriaan T. Peperzak (1998). Bonaventure's Contribution to the Twentieth Century Debate on Apophatic Theology. Faith and Philosophy 15 (2):181-192.
Suzanne Metselaar (2011). The Structural Similarity Between the Itinerarium Mentis in Deum and the Collationes in Hexaemeron with Regard to Bonaventure's Doctrine of God as First Known. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 85 (1):43-75.
Christopher B. Gray (1993). Bonaventure's Proof of Trinity. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 67 (2):201-217.
John Platt (1982). Reformed Thought and Scholasticism: The Arguments for the Existence of God in Dutch Theology, 1575-1650. E.J. Brill.
T. Corbishley (1949). Franciscan Institute Publications; Philosophy Series: The Franciscan Institute, St. Bonaventure, N.Y.: The Tractatus de Successivis, Attributed to William of Ockham.Franciscan Institute Publications; Philosophy Series: The Franciscan Institute, St. Bonaventure, N.Y.: The Tractatus de Praedestinatione Et de Praescientia Dei Et de Futuris Contingentibus, Edited by Philotheus Boehner, O.F.M.Franciscan Institute Publications; Philosophy Series: The Franciscan Institute, St. Bonaventure, N.Y.: The Transcendentals and Their Function in the Metaphysics of Duns Scotus, by Allan B. Wolter, O.F.M., Ph.D.Franciscan Institute Publications; Philosophy Series: The Franciscan Institute, St. Bonaventure, N.Y.: Intuitive Cognition, A Key to the Significance of the Later Scholastics, by Sebastian J. Day, O.F.M., Ph.D. [REVIEW] Philosophy 24 (90):274-.
Added to index2011-12-01
Total downloads18 ( #174,675 of 1,781,482 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #167,885 of 1,781,482 )
How can I increase my downloads?