David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 7:151-159 (2000)
Concentrating on the legacy of David Hume, I discuss the impact of his psychologism on his two most important sharp distinctions: (1) between statements about the relations of ideas and those about matters of fact; and (2) between what is and what ought to be. I argue that his concept of relations of ideas is subject to difficulties like those attending the concept of synonymy in twentieth-century discussions, and also that his psychologism should lead him to say that (1) is not a sharp distinction. I then raise the more difficult question of whether Hume would have said, as Quine does, that normative epistemology is an empirical science but that normative ethics is not. Finally, I discuss the difficulty of presenting naturalistic support for the claim that a scientific theory ought to predict successfully, be comparatively simple, and respect older truths in some degree
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Graeme Garrard (2006). Counter-Enlightenments: From the Eighteenth-Century to the Present. Routledge.
David Owen (2009). Hume and the Mechanics of Mind : Impressions, Ideas, and Association. In David Fate Norton & Jacqueline Anne Taylor (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Hume. Cambridge University Press.
Kimberly A. Wade-Benzoni (2010). The Legacy Motive. Business Ethics Quarterly 20 (2):153-185.
Alexander Broadie (ed.) (2003). The Cambridge Companion to the Scottish Enlightenment. Cambridge University Press.
Michael Gill (2000). Hume’s Progressive View of Human Nature. Hume Studies 26 (1):87-108.
Knud Haakonssen (1996). Natural Law and Moral Philosophy: From Grotius to the Scottish Enlightenment. Cambridge University Press.
James Maffie (2005). The Consequences of Ideas. Social Epistemology 19 (1):63 – 76.
Jeff Noonan (2012). The Clash of Ideas in World Politics. By John M. Owen IV. The European Legacy 17 (5):704 - 705.
Walter Ott (2006). Hume on Meaning. Hume Studies 32 (2):233-252.
Saul Traiger (2010). Experience and Testimony in Hume's Philosophy. Episteme 7 (1):42-57.
Ronan De Calan (forthcoming). Les « Relations of Ideas » Une Matrice du Synthétique « a Priori » ? Revue de Métaphysique Et de Morale.
Added to index2012-03-18
Total downloads2 ( #258,237 of 1,088,810 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #69,666 of 1,088,810 )
How can I increase my downloads?