David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 7:151-159 (2000)
Concentrating on the legacy of David Hume, I discuss the impact of his psychologism on his two most important sharp distinctions: (1) between statements about the relations of ideas and those about matters of fact; and (2) between what is and what ought to be. I argue that his concept of relations of ideas is subject to difficulties like those attending the concept of synonymy in twentieth-century discussions, and also that his psychologism should lead him to say that (1) is not a sharp distinction. I then raise the more difficult question of whether Hume would have said, as Quine does, that normative epistemology is an empirical science but that normative ethics is not. Finally, I discuss the difficulty of presenting naturalistic support for the claim that a scientific theory ought to predict successfully, be comparatively simple, and respect older truths in some degree
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Graeme Garrard (2006). Counter-Enlightenments: From the Eighteenth-Century to the Present. Routledge.
David Owen (2009). Hume and the Mechanics of Mind : Impressions, Ideas, and Association. In David Fate Norton & Jacqueline Anne Taylor (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Hume. Cambridge University Press
Kimberly A. Wade-Benzoni (2010). The Legacy Motive. Business Ethics Quarterly 20 (2):153-185.
Alexander Broadie (ed.) (2003). The Cambridge Companion to the Scottish Enlightenment. Cambridge University Press.
Michael Gill (2000). Hume’s Progressive View of Human Nature. Hume Studies 26 (1):87-108.
Knud Haakonssen (1996). Natural Law and Moral Philosophy: From Grotius to the Scottish Enlightenment. Cambridge University Press.
James Maffie (2005). The Consequences of Ideas. Social Epistemology 19 (1):63 – 76.
Jeff Noonan (2012). The Clash of Ideas in World Politics. By John M. Owen IV. The European Legacy 17 (5):704 - 705.
Walter Ott (2006). Hume on Meaning. Hume Studies 32 (2):233-252.
Saul Traiger (2010). Experience and Testimony in Hume's Philosophy. Episteme 7 (1):42-57.
Ronan De Calan (forthcoming). Les « Relations of Ideas » Une Matrice du Synthétique « a Priori » ? Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale.
Added to index2012-03-18
Total downloads16 ( #239,712 of 1,934,702 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #269,464 of 1,934,702 )
How can I increase my downloads?