The lie of fmri: An examination of the ethics of a market in lie detection using functional magnetic resonance imaging [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
HEC Forum 22 (3):253-266 (2010)
In this paper, I argue that companies who use functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) scans for lie detection encounter the same basic ethical stumbling blocks as commercial companies that market traditional polygraphs. Markets in traditional voluntary polygraphs are common and fail to elicit much uproar among ethicists. Thus, for consistency, if markets in polygraphs are ethically unproblematic, markets using fMRIs for lie detection are equally as acceptable. Furthermore, while I acknowledge two substantial differences between the ethical concerns involving polygraphs and fMRI lie detection, I argue that these concerns can be overcome and do not lead to the conclusion that markets in fMRI lie detection are ethically dubious. It is my conclusion that voluntary markets in fMRI lie detection can be justified by consumer autonomy and should be allowed to persist
|Keywords||Ethics Bioethics fMRI Lie detection Polygraph Cognitive liberty|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Richard G. Boire (2005). Searching the Brain: The Fourth Amendment Implications of Brain-Based Deception Detection Devices. American Journal of Bioethics 5 (2):62-63.
Henry T. Greely (2005). Premarket Approval Regulation for Lie Detections: An Idea Whose Time May Be Coming. American Journal of Bioethics 5 (2):50-52.
Ronald M. Green (2005). Spy Versus Spy. American Journal of Bioethics 5 (2):53-54.
Judy Illes (ed.) (2005). Neuroethics: Defining the Issues in Theory, Practice, and Policy. OUP Oxford.
Daniel D. Langleben, Kenneth R. Foster & Paul Root Wolpe (2010). Emerging Neurotechnologies for Lie-Detection: Promises and Perils. American Journal of Bioethics 10 (10):40-48.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Rebecca Dresser (2010). Brain Imaging and Courtroom Deception. Hastings Center Report 40 (6):7-8.
Kevin A. Johnson, F. Andrew Kozel, Steven J. Laken & Mark S. George (2007). The Neuroscience of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fmri for Deception Detection. American Journal of Bioethics 7 (9):58 – 60.
Steven E. Hyman (2010). Emerging Neurotechnologies for Lie-Detection: Where Are We Now? An Appraisal of Wolpe, Foster and Langleben's “Emerging Neurotechnologies for Lie-Detection: Promise and Perils” Five Years Later. American Journal of Bioethics 10 (10):49-50.
Allyson C. Rosen (2009). Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (Fmri) in the Classroom. American Journal of Bioethics 9 (1):30 – 31.
Caitlin M. Connors & Ilina Singh (2009). What We Should Really Worry About in Pediatric Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (Fmri). American Journal of Bioethics 9 (1):16 – 18.
Colin Klein (2010). Philosophical Issues in Neuroimaging. Philosophy Compass 5 (2):186-198.
Kim Celone & Chantal Stern (2009). A Neuroimaging Perspective on the Use of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (Fmri) in Educational and Legal Systems. American Journal of Bioethics 9 (1):28 – 29.
Moriah E. Thomason (2009). Children in Non-Clinical Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (Fmri) Studies Give the Scan Experience a “Thumbs Up”. American Journal of Bioethics 9 (1):25 – 27.
Emily Bell & Eric Racine (2009). Enthusiasm for Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (Fmri) Often Overlooks its Dependence on Task Selection and Performance. American Journal of Bioethics 9 (1):23 – 25.
Lisa J. Burklund & Matthew D. Lieberman (2012). Advances in Functional Neuroimaging of Psychopathology. Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 18 (4):333-337.
Zoe Kourtzi & Mark Augath, Integration of Local Features Into Global Shapes: Monkey and Human fMRI Studies.
Adrian M. Owen, Martin R. Coleman, Melanie Boly, Matthew H. Davis, Steven Laureys & John D. Pickard (2007). Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Detect Covert Awareness in the Vegetative State. Archives of Neurology 64 (8):1098-1102.
Added to index2010-11-17
Total downloads11 ( #135,198 of 1,098,832 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #286,314 of 1,098,832 )
How can I increase my downloads?