David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Philosophy of Education 43 (1):123-141 (2009)
Richard Peters argued for a general education based largely on the study of truth-seeking subjects for its own sake. His arguments have long been acknowledged as problematic. There are also difficulties with Paul Hirst's arguments for a liberal education, which in part overlap with Peters'. Where justification fails, can historical explanation illuminate? Peters was influenced by the prevailing idea that a secondary education should be based on traditional, largely knowledge-orientated subjects, pursued for intrinsic as well as practical ends. Does history reveal good reasons for this view? The view itself has roots going back to the 16th century and the educational tradition of radical Protestantism. Religious arguments to do with restoring the image of an omniscient God in man made good sense, within their own terms, of an encyclopaedic approach to education. As these faded in prominence after 1800, old curricular patterns persisted in the drive for ‘middle-class schools’, and new, less plausible justifications grew in salience. These were based first on faculty psychology and later on the psychology of individual differences. The essay relates the views of Peters and Hirst to these historical arguments, asking how far their writings show traces of the religious argument mentioned, and how their views on education and the development of mind relate to the psychological arguments.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Thomas Reid (2002). Essays on the Intellectual Powers of Man. Pennsylvania State University Press.
Thomas Reid (2002/1971). Essays on the Intellectual Powers of Man. Pennsylvania State University Press.
R. S. Peters (1970/1967). Ethics and Education. London,Allen and Unwin.
Paul Heywood Hirst (1970). The Logic of Education. London,Routledge & K. Paul.
A. Bain (1878). Education as a Science. Mind 3 (11):304-323.
Citations of this work BETA
Kubilay Kaptan (2016). Role of Methodology in Action Research. Journal of Philosophy of Education 50 (1).
Similar books and articles
Penny Enslin (1985). Are Hirst and Peters Liberal Philosophers of Education? Journal of Philosophy of Education 19 (2):211–222.
Michael S. Katz (2009). R. S. Peters' Normative Conception of Education and Educational Aims. Journal of Philosophy of Education 43 (1):97-108.
Paul Heywood Hirst, Robin Barrow & Patricia White (eds.) (1993). Beyond Liberal Education: Essays in Honour of Paul H. Hirst. Routledge.
Robin Barrow (2009). Was Peters Nearly Right About Education? Journal of Philosophy of Education 43 (1):9-25.
Marnie Hughes-Warrington (1997). Collingwood and the Early Paul Hirst on the Forms of Experience-Knowledge and Education. British Journal of Educational Studies 45 (2):156 - 173.
Michael Hand (2009). On the Worthwhileness of Theoretical Activities. Journal of Philosophy of Education 43 (s1):109-121.
Bryan R. Warnick (2009). Ritual, Imitation and Education in R. S. Peters. Journal of Philosophy of Education 43 (1):57-74.
Kelvin Stewart Beckett (2011). R.S. Peters and the Concept of Education. Educational Theory 61 (3):239-255.
R. J. Royce (1983). R.S. Peters and Moral Education, 1: The Justification of Procedural Principles. Journal of Moral Education 12 (3):174-181.
Added to index2009-09-10
Total downloads183 ( #18,154 of 1,793,000 )
Recent downloads (6 months)43 ( #19,858 of 1,793,000 )
How can I increase my downloads?