International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 2 (1):41-64 (2008)
|Abstract||I shall argue that, according to Aristotle, the knowledge we may attain is profoundly qualified by our status as human knowers. Throughout the corpus, Aristotle maintains a separation of knowledge at the broadest level into two kinds, human and divine. The separation is not complete—human knowers may enjoy temporarily what god or the gods enjoy on a continuous basis; but the division expresses a fact about humanity's place in the cosmos, one that imposes strict conditions on what we may know, with what degree of certainty, and in what areas. While passages bearing on human knowledge are familiar, looking at them collectively and in comparison with certain other well known Aristotelian doctrines may significantly affect how we understand the goals of his philosophy and why our hopes for reaching them must be limited.|
|Keywords||INTELLECT KNOWLEDGE SCEPTICISM GOD ARISTOTLE PLATO|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Carlo Cellucci, Knowledge and the Meaning of Human Life. naturalism.org.
Mark Wynn (2007). Knowledge of Place and Knowledge of God: Contemporary Philosophies of Place and Some Questions in Philosophical Theology. [REVIEW] International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 62 (3):149 - 169.
Karl R. Popper (1979). Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach. Oxford University Press.
Mark K. Spencer (2007). Full Human Flourishing. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 81:193-204.
Alexandra Pârvan (2011). La Relation En Tant Qu'élément-Clé de l'Illumination Augustinienne. Chôra 7:87-103.
Zena Hitz (2011). Aristotle on Self-Knowledge and Friendship. Philosophers' Imprint 11 (12):1-28.
James Lennox, Aristotle's Biology. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads25 ( #55,603 of 722,700 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,006 of 722,700 )
How can I increase my downloads?