David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy of the Social Sciences 22 (1):5-27 (1992)
In recent years, there have been multiple instances of misconduct in science, yet no coherent framework exists for characterizing this phenomenon. The thesis of this article is that economic analysis can provide such a framework. Economic analysis leads to two categories of misconduct: replication failure and fraud. Replication failure can be understood as the scientist making optimal use of time in a professional environment where innovation is emphasized rather than replication. Fraud can be depicted as a deliberate gamble under conditions of uncertainty: The scientist takes advantage of the complexity of science and undermines the integrity of science for personal gain or advancement.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Philip Mirowski (1993). Comment. Social Epistemology 7 (3):278 – 283.
James R. Wible (1994). Charles Sanders Peirce's Economy of Research. Journal of Economic Methodology 1 (1):135-160.
James R. Wible (1994). Book Reviews. [REVIEW] Journal of Economic Methodology 1 (2):314-329.
Similar books and articles
Teressa L. Elliott, Linda M. Marquis & Catherine S. Neal (2013). Business Ethics Perspectives: Faculty Plagiarism and Fraud. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 112 (1):91-99.
Murat Gunduz & Oytun Önder (2013). Corruption and Internal Fraud in the Turkish Construction Industry. Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (2):505-528.
Michael Strevens (2011). Economic Approaches to Understanding Scientific Norms. Episteme 8 (2):184-200.
Wenceslao J. González (2008). Economic Values in the Configuration of Science. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 96 (1):85-112.
Bjørn Hofmann (2007). That's Not Science! The Role of Moral Philosophy in the Science/Non-Science Divide. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 28 (3):243-256.
Sam Silverman (1994). Process and Detection in Fraud and Deceit. Ethics and Behavior 4 (3):219 – 228.
Jacquelyn Anne K. Kegley (2010). Peirce and Royce and the Betrayal of Science: Scientific Fraud and Misconduct. The Pluralist 5 (2):87-104.
G. J. Rossouw (2000). Defining and Understanding Fraud. Business Ethics Quarterly 10 (4):885-895.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads4 ( #272,063 of 1,139,992 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #157,514 of 1,139,992 )
How can I increase my downloads?