Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 53 (2):189-193 (1995)
|Abstract||This essay critically examines the view recently set forth by Paul Guyer that Kant's theories of artistic beauty and artistic creativity exclusively coincide with this theory of natural beauty. I note that very great works of art, although they may indeed be beautiful, also tend to be sublime. To acknowledge the sense of awe which attends those great works of art which are also beautiful, I argue that Kant's theory of sublimity must also be included within an accurate interpretation of Kant's account of artistic beauty, and maintain that Guyer's exclusive reference to Kant's theory of natural beauty will not suffice|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Gabriele Tomasi (2005). Kant on Painting and the Representation of the Sublime. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 5 (3):545-567.
Salim Kemal (1986). Kant and Fine Art: An Essay on Kant and the Philosophy of Fine Art and Culture. Oxford University Press.
Paul Crowther (2007). Defining Art, Creating the Canon: Artistic Value in an Era of Doubt. Oxford University Press.
Uygar Abaci (2008). Kant's Justified Dismissal of Artistic Sublimity. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 66 (3):237 - 251.
Roger Scruton (2009). Beauty. Oxford University Press.
Paul Guyer (1995). Beauty, Sublimity, and Expression: Reply to Wicks and Cantrick. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 53 (2):194-195.
Graham McFee (2005). The Artistic and the Aesthetic. British Journal of Aesthetics 45 (4):368-387.
Paul Guyer (2005). Values of Beauty: Historical Essays in Aesthetics. Cambridge University Press.
Robert R. Clewis (2010). A Case for Kantian Artistic Sublimity: A Response to Abaci. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 68 (2):167-170.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads12 ( #101,057 of 722,700 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,006 of 722,700 )
How can I increase my downloads?