The continuing debate over risk-related standards of competence
Bioethics 13 (2):149–153 (1999)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,653 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJeremy Snyder, Cari L. Miller & Glenda Gray (2011). Relative Versus Absolute Standards for Everyday Risk in Adolescent HIV Prevention Trials: Expanding the Debate. American Journal of Bioethics 11 (6):5 - 13.
Robert Pepper-Smith, William R. C. Harvey & M. Silberfeld (1996). Competency and Practical Judgment. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 17 (2).
David Wendler (2004). Risk Standards for Pediatric Research: Rethinking The. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 14 (2).
Dipankar Ghosh & Terry L. Crain (1995). Ethical Standards, Attitudes Toward Risk, and Intentional Noncompliance: An Experimental Investigation. Journal of Business Ethics 14 (5):353 - 365.
Haavi Morreim (1983). Three Concepts of Patient Competence. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 4 (3).
Loane Skene (1991). Risk-Related Standard Inevitable in Assessing Competence. Bioethics 5 (2):113–117.
David Checkland (2001). On Risk and Decisional Capacity. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 26 (1):35 – 59.
Ian Wilks (1997). The Debate Over Risk-Related Standards of Competence. Bioethics 11 (5):413-426.
Gita S. Cale (1999). Continuing the Debate Over Risk-Related Standards of Competence. Bioethics 13 (2):131–148.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads4 ( #178,473 of 548,984 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
