Why Communities and Their Goods Matter: Illustrated with the Example of Biobanks

Public Health Ethics 4 (1):14-25 (2011)
Abstract
It is now being recognized across the spectrum of bioethics, and particularly in genetics and population ethics, that to focus on the individual person, and thereby neglect communities and the goods which accrue to them, is to fail to see all the ethically significant features of a range of ethical issues. This article argues that more work needs to be done in order for bioethics to respect not only goods (such as rights and interests) of communities per se, but also to recognize the difference between different types of communities and their goods. The diversity of communities and the types of communal goods which accrue to them is first outlined. Following this, a basic distinction between two such types: aggregative and corporate community goods, is explained and defended, and it is then argued argue that this distinction is necessary to understand and address what and whom is ethically at stake in any situation. This is illustrated with the example of UK Biobank, the conclusion being that if current and future individual are to be respected then communal goods of both types must be recognized and respected in an effective bioethics
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 11,404
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Mark A. Rothstein (2005). Expanding the Ethical Analysis of Biobanks. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 33 (1):89-101.
Citations of this work BETA
Sean Cordell (2011). The Biobank as an Ethical Subject. Health Care Analysis 19 (3):282-294.
Similar books and articles
James Morauta (2002). Rights and Participatory Goods. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 22 (1):91-113.
Julie Tannenbaum (2010). Categorizing Goods. In Russ Shafer-Landau (ed.), Oxford Studies in Metaethics. Vol 5. Oxford University Press.
Michael Funke (2009). Rawlsian Primary Goods and CSR. International Corporate Responsibility Series 4:17-33.
Jonny Anomaly (2011). Public Health and Public Goods. Public Health Ethics 4 (3):251-259.
Ian Maitland (2002). Priceless Goods. Business Ethics Quarterly 12 (4):451-480.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2011-03-08

Total downloads

11 ( #138,953 of 1,103,010 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

6 ( #46,928 of 1,103,010 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.