In Kate Brennan (ed.), Making Global Institutions Work: Power, Accountability and Change. Routledge (forthcoming)
|Abstract||My aim in this paper is twofold. First, I challenge the view that ideal normative principles offer appropriate guidelines for our efforts to identify morally progressive institutional reform strategies. I shall call this view the "ideal guidance approach." Second, I develop an alternative methodological approach to specifying nonideal normative principles, which I call the "failure analysis approach." I contrast these alternatives using examples from the global justice literature.|
|Keywords||nonideal theory institutional reform|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
David Wiens (2012). Prescribing Institutions Without Ideal Theory. Journal of Political Philosophy 20 (1):45-70.
Pablo Gilabert (2008). Global Justice and Poverty Relief in Nonideal Circumstances. Social Theory and Practice 34 (3):411-438.
Lisa Tessman (2010). Idealizing Morality. Hypatia 25 (4):797-824.
David Wiens (2011). Engineering Global Justice: Achieving Success Through Failure Analysis. Dissertation, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor (UM)
Christian Barry & Thomas Winfried Menko Pogge (eds.) (2005). Global Institutions and Responsibilities: Achieving Global Justice. Blackwell.
Paul Weirich (2004). Realistic Decision Theory: Rules for Nonideal Agents in Nonideal Circumstances. OUP USA.
Kok-Chor Tan (2012). Justice, Institutions, and Luck: The Site, Ground, and Scope of Equality. OUP Oxford.
Marcus Arvan (2008). A Nonideal Theory of Justice. Dissertation, University of Arizona
Added to index2012-11-24
Total downloads35 ( #34,753 of 556,807 )
Recent downloads (6 months)34 ( #1,476 of 556,807 )
How can I increase my downloads?