David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 69 (2):139-151 (2011)
All of the ingredients for what has become known as Anselmian perfect being theology were present already in the thought of St. Augustine. This paper develops that thesis by calling attention to various claims Augustine makes. It then asks whether there are principled reasons for determining which properties the greatest possible being has and whether an account of what contributes to greatness can settle the question whether the greatest possible being is the same as the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. The paper develops Augustine’s answer to the first question by extracting several principles he endorses that generate a hierarchy of greatness. It addresses the second question by discussing the requirements of worship and of creation
|Keywords||Perfect being theology Augustine Greatness Worship|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Alvin Plantinga (1992). The Nature of Necessity. Clarendon Press.
Yujin Nagasawa (2008). A New Defence of Anselmian Theism. Philosophical Quarterly 58 (233):577-596.
Edward Wierenga (1989). The Nature of God: An Inquiry Into Divine Attributes. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Clark Pinnock, Richard Rice, John Sanders, William Hasker & David Basinger (1994). The Openness of God: A Biblical Challenge to the Traditional Understanding of God. Downers Grove: Intervarsity Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Keith Ward (1999). The God of the Philosophers and the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy 8 (2):157-170.
Nicholas Everitt (2006). The Argument From Imperfection. Philo 9 (2):113-130.
Brian Leftow (1997). Anselm on the Cost of Salvation. Medieval Philosophy and Theology 6 (1):73 - 92.
Maarten Wisse (2008). “Pro Salute Nostra Reparanda”: Radical Orthodoxy's Christology of Manifestation Versus Augustine's Moral Christology. Neue Zeitschrift für Systematicsche Theologie Und Religionsphilosophie 49 (3):349-376.
William Wainwright (2009). Two (or Maybe One and a Half) Cheers for Perfect Being Theology. Philo 12 (2):228-251.
Einar Duenger Bohn (2012). Anselmian Theism and Indefinitely Extensible Perfection. Philosophical Quarterly 62 (249):671-683.
Howard J. Curzer (2007). Abraham, the Faithless Moral Superhero. Philosophy and Literature 31 (2):344-361.
Katharine Loevy (2012). Levinas and the Binding of Isaac. Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 16 (2):407-423.
N. Trakakis (2010). Does Univocity Entail Idolatry? Sophia 49 (4):535-555.
Jacob Adler (1989). Divine Attributes in Spinoza. Philosophy and Theology 4 (1):33-52.
Thomas V. Morris (1984). The God of Abraham, Isaac, and Anselm. Faith and Philosophy 1 (2):177-187.
Sean J. McGrath (2008). Alternative Confessions, Conflicting Faiths: A Review of the Influence of Augustine on Heidegger. [REVIEW] American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 82 (2):317-335.
David W. Paulsen (1999). The God of Abraham, Isaac, and (William) James. Journal of Speculative Philosophy 13 (2):114-146.
Robert Barron (2007). 3. Augustine's Questions: Why the Augustinian Theology of God Matters Today. Logos 10 (4).
Lenn Evan Goodman (1996). God of Abraham. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2010-11-18
Total downloads60 ( #76,312 of 1,937,424 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #292,091 of 1,937,424 )
How can I increase my downloads?