Graduate studies at Western
|Abstract||This paper sets out to show that philosophy has much to gain from the web, and explores what philosophy on the web might be like. We argue that philosophers usage of the web will undeniably go beyond on-line journals, and the distribution of .pdf files. The failure of historical attempts at making the web work for philosophy are investigated and explained, such as the Xanadu and Discovery projects, and plain web-forums. LogiLogi, a working prototype of a philosophical discussion platform, is then introduced. LogiLogi is different from forums and wikis and tries to overcome their limitations. It does so by aiming for an informal middle-road between good conversations and journal-papers and by providing a form of quick, informal publication, peer-review, and annotation of short philosophical texts. The paper concludes with a tentative analysis of what philosophy on the web should be like, and how LogiLogi is tailored to such a conception of philosophy.|
|Keywords||LogiLogi Web Philosophy Metaphilosophy On-line systems|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Luciano Floridi (2009). Web 2.0 Vs. The Semantic Web: A Philosophical Assessment. Episteme 6 (1):25-37.
Helen Kennedy (2012). Net Work: Ethics and Values in Web Design. Palgrave Macmillan.
Harry Halpin (2011). Sense and Reference on the Web. Minds and Machines 21 (2):153-178.
Marsha Woodbury (1998). Defining Web Ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics 4 (2):203-212.
Paolo Bouquet, Heiko Stoermer & Massimiliano Vignolo (2012). Web of Data and Web of Entities: Identity and Reference in Interlinked Data in the Semantic Web. Philosophy and Technology 25 (1):5-26.
Added to index2010-02-19
Total downloads71 ( #14,731 of 741,433 )
Recent downloads (6 months)45 ( #1,548 of 741,433 )
How can I increase my downloads?