David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Ethics and Behavior 6 (3):189 – 202 (1996)
The Human Genome Project has raised many issues regarding the contributions of genetics to a variety of diseases and societal conditions. With genetic testing now easily conducted with lowered costs in nonmedical domains, a variety of privacy issues must be considered. Such testing will result in the loss of significant privacy rights for the individual. Society must now consider such issues as the ownership of genetic data, confidentiality rights to such information, limits placed on genetic screening, and legislation to control genetic testing and its applications. There is often a conflict between individual rights to privacy and the need for societal protection.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Thomas S. Kuhn (1996). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press.
J. L. Mackie & Abraham Kaplan (1966). The Conduct of Inquiry: Methodology for Behavioral Science. Philosophical Quarterly 16 (65):404.
Citations of this work BETA
Neil I. Wiener & David L. Wiesenthal (1999). Ethical Questions in the Age of the New Eugenics. Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (3):383-394.
Karen Eltis (2007). Genetic Determinism and Discrimination: A Call to Re-Orient Prevailing Human Rights Discourse to Better Comport with the Public Implications of Individual Genetic Testing. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 35 (2):282-294.
Karen Eltis (2007). Genetic Determinism and Discrimination: A Call to Re-Orient Prevailing Human Rights Discourse to Better Comport with the Public Implications of Individual Genetic Testing. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 35 (2):282-294.
Similar books and articles
Soraj Hongladarom (2009). Privacy, the Individual and Genetic Information: A Buddhist Perspective. Bioethics 23 (7):403-412.
Christian Byk (1992). The Human Genome Project and the Social Contract: A Law Policy Approach. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 17 (4):371-380.
Eline Bunnik, Maartje Schermer & A. Cecile Janssens (2011). Personal Genome Testing: Test Characteristics to Clarify the Discourse on Ethical, Legal and Societal Issues. [REVIEW] BMC Medical Ethics 12 (1):11-.
Philip Kitcher (1994). Who's Afraid of the Human Genome Project? PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:313-321.
Adam D. Moore (2000). Owning Genetic Information and Gene Enhancement Techniques: Why Privacy and Property Rights May Undermine Social Control of the Human Genome. Bioethics 14 (2):97–119.
John A. Robertson (2003). The $1000 Genome: Ethical and Legal Issues in Whole Genome Sequencing of Individuals. [REVIEW] American Journal of Bioethics 3 (3):35-42.
Ruth Chadwick (2011). Personal Genomes: No Bad News? Bioethics 25 (2):62-65.
G. T. Laurie (2002). Genetic Privacy: A Challenge to Medico-Legal Norms. Cambridge University Press.
Richard A. Spinello (2004). Property Rights in Genetic Information. Ethics and Information Technology 6 (1):29-42.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads25 ( #159,094 of 1,911,311 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #457,064 of 1,911,311 )
How can I increase my downloads?