Regress Argument Reconstruction

Argumentation 26 (4):489-503 (2012)
If an argument can be reconstructed in at least two different ways, then which reconstruction is to be preferred? In this paper I address this problem of argument reconstruction in terms of Ryle’s infinite regress argument against the view that knowledge-how requires knowledge-that. First, I demonstrate that Ryle’s initial statement of the argument does not fix its reconstruction as it admits two, structurally different reconstructions. On the basis of this case and infinite regress arguments generally, I defend a revisionary take on argument reconstruction: argument reconstruction is mainly to be ruled by charity (viz. by general criteria which arguments have to fulfil in order to be good arguments) rather than interpretation.
Keywords Infinite regress  Argument  Reconstruction  Charity  Interpretation
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10503-012-9264-9
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 16,667
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Jason Stanley & Timothy Williamson (2001). Knowing How. Journal of Philosophy 98 (8):411-444.

View all 33 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Yuri Cath (2013). Regarding a Regress. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 94 (3):358-388.
Julia Tanner (2007). Intrinsic Value and the Argument From Regress. Forum Philosophicum: International Journal for Philosophy 12 (2):313-322..
Christopher Yeomans (2006). Thomas Reid and Some Regress Arguments. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 88 (1):54-81.
Marek Picha (2011). How to Reconstruct a Thought Experiment. Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 18 (2):154-188.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

100 ( #31,243 of 1,726,249 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

43 ( #27,203 of 1,726,249 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.