Philosophy 78 (4):483-494 (2003)
|Abstract||Timothy Williamson offers a proof of the counterintuitive claim that, if an object exists, then it exists necessarily. David Wiggins argues that this result reveals the philosophical disadvantage of a first level (or ‘ticking over’) view of the very ‘exists’ and the advantage of the second level account offered by Frege and Russell. The author seeks to show how, using an idea of G. Evans but without the use of the resources of ‘free logic’, all occurrences of ‘exist’, including its occurrence in true, negative existential, singular statements, can be accommodated to the Frege–Russell view and accorded the intuitively required modal status.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Ian Rumfitt (2003). Contingent Existents. Philosophy 78 (4):461-481.
R. M. Sainsbury (1999). Names, Fictional Names, and 'Really': R.M. Sainsbury. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 73 (1):243–269.
Timothy Williamson (2002). Necessary Existents. In A. O'Hear (ed.), Logic, Thought, and Language. Cambridge University Press.
George Englebretsen (2010). Making Sense of Truth-Makers. Topoi 29 (2):147-151.
William F. Vallicella (1995). Do Individuals Exist? Journal of Philosophical Research 20:195-220.
Xunwu Chen (2011). Crisis and Possibility: The Ethical Implication of Contingency. Asian Philosophy 21 (3):257 - 268.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads48 ( #26,469 of 722,765 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #36,437 of 722,765 )
How can I increase my downloads?