David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 100 (1):1-32 (2000)
I. The development of the earth has not progressed in the way that Leibniz so hopefully envisaged three hundred years ago. Late twentieth century disillusion demonstrated by citation. II-IV. In making sense of that disillusion it is a good beginning to abstain from speculative extravagance and simply to bring the human scale of values to bear; then to inquire how far the destruction of that which we prize has been gratuitous or economically subsidized. The human scale of values is not a scale of exclusively human values. It gives no licence to the instrumentalist attitude. V. The swallow or the lapwing in Cambridgeshire as a value recognized by the human scale of values, but misrepresented by many forms of economic analysis. The off-colour presuppositions of the question 'Can we afford to save the swallow in Cambridgeshire?' Will the natural framework be preserved for meaningful life, or will human beings face an aeon of inanition? VI. Every departure from policies of 'sustainability' to be justified by dire need. Incommensurability in the theory of practical reason, and in possible forms of politics. John Stuart Mill on a world with 'nothing left to the spontaneous activity of Nature'. VII. 'Nature' explicated by the use of three contrasts proposed by Hume. VIII. Respect for Nature? Roman religio and its secular-cum-precautionary counterpart. In risk analysis, are there moral asymmetries between assurable satisfaction of vital needs and probable provision of future benefits? Analogous asymmetries with respect to the reasonableness of the reliance on Nature under normal conditions and under radically altered conditions
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Robin Attfield (2011). Beyond Anthropocentrism. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 69:29-46.
Simon P. James (2013). Philistinism and the Preservation of Nature. Philosophy 88 (01):101-114.
Similar books and articles
David Wiggins (2000). The Presidential Address: Nature, Respect for Nature, and the Human Scale of Values. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 100 (1):1–32.
Rolston (1981). Values in Nature. Environmental Ethics 3 (2):113-128.
Iii Holmes Rolston (1981). Values in Nature. Environmental Ethics 3 (2):113-128.
Jeremy Bendik-Keymer (2001). Analogical Extension and Analogical Implication in Environmental Moral Philosophy. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 8 (2):149-158.
James Connelly (2006). Respecting Nature? Res Publica 12 (1):97-108.
Gene Spitler (1982). Justifying a Respect for Nature. Environmental Ethics 4 (3):255-260.
Nigel Dower (2005). The Nature and Scope of Global Ethics and the Relevance of the Earth Charter. Journal of Global Ethics 1 (1):25 – 43.
Keith Allen (2010). Locke and the Nature of Ideas. Archiv fur Geschishte der Philosophie 92 (3):236-255.
Klaus M. Meyer-Abich (1979). Toward a Practical Philosophy of Nature. Environmental Ethics 1 (4):293-308.
Rolston (2008). Mountain Majesties Above Fruited Plains. Environmental Ethics 30 (1):3-20.
Kenneth H. Simonsen (1981). The Value of Wildness. Environmental Ethics 3 (3):259-263.
Jerry Williams & Shaun Parkman (2003). On Humans and Environment: The Role of Consciousness in Environmental Problems. [REVIEW] Human Studies 26 (4):449-460.
Grant Ramsey (2013). Human Nature in a Post-Essentialist World. Philosophy of Science 80 (5):983-993.
Jason Brennan (2007). Dominating Nature. Environmental Values 16 (4):513-528.
Added to index2010-09-13
Total downloads37 ( #96,057 of 1,780,180 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #291,056 of 1,780,180 )
How can I increase my downloads?