Philosophical Quarterly 25 (April):126-137 (1975)
|Abstract||This article defends psychology and psychoanalysis against the accusation that their use of anthropomorphism in descriptions of brain and mind reintroduces the 'little man in the brain' and generates a viciously circular analysis. It queries the clarity of the concept 'anthropomorphic', And argues that many predicates which are allegedly 'characteristically human' are freely and literally attributable to machines, Parts of the brain, Etc.; this merely points out the unsurprising fact that non-Humans often perform tasks which humans can also perform. It does not make these non-Humans into intelligent man-Analogues|
|Keywords||Analogy Anthropomorphism Brain Consciousness Psychology Science Freud|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Joseph M. Notterman (2000). Note on Reductionism in Cognitive Psychology: Reification of Cognitive Processes Into Mind, Mind-Brain Equivalence, and Brain-Computer Analogy. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 20 (2):116-121.
Maurice Mandelbaum (1943). A Note on "Anthropomorphism" in Psychology. Journal of Philosophy 40 (9):246-248.
R. Mitchell, Nicholas S. Thompson & H. L. Miles (eds.) (1997). Anthropomorphism, Anecdotes, and Animals. SUNY Press.
Frederick V. Smith (1959). Psychological Concepts and Linguistic Restraints. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 10 (November):223-227.
David R. Hilbert (1993). Comments on Anthropomorphism. Philosophical Studies 69 (2-3):123-127.
Sarah Stebbins (1993). Anthropomorphism. Philosophical Studies 69 (2-3):113-122.
Fredrik Karlsson (2012). Critical Anthropomorphism and Animal Ethics. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 25 (5):707-720.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads17 ( #77,993 of 722,745 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,247 of 722,745 )
How can I increase my downloads?