Affected ignorance and animal suffering: Why our failure to debate factory farming puts us at moral risk [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 21 (4):371-384 (2008)
It is widely recognized that our social and moral environments influence our actions and belief formations. We are never fully immune to the effects of cultural membership. What is not clear, however, is whether these influences excuse average moral agents who fail to scrutinize conventional norms. In this paper, I argue that the lack of extensive public debate about factory farming and, its corollary, extreme animal suffering, is probably due, in part, to affected ignorance. Although a complex phenomenon because of its many manifestations, affected ignorance is morally culpable because it involves a choice not to investigate whether some practice in which one participates in might be immoral. I contend further that James Montmarquet’s set of intellectual virtues can provide a positive account of what it means to act as a responsible moral agent while immersed in a meat eating culture; they also represent the moral and epistemic framework for the kind of public discourse that should be taking place.
|Keywords||affected ignorance animal suffering cultural membership factory farming intellectual virtues meat eating moral ignorance responsibility|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Peter Singer (ed.) (1990). Animal Liberation. Avon Books.
James Montmarquet (1993). Epistemic Virtue and Doxastic Responsibility. Rowman & Littlefield.
Michele M. Moody-Adams (1994). Culture, Responsibility, and Affected Ignorance. Ethics 104 (2):291-309.
Cheshire Calhoun (1989). Responsibility and Reproach. Ethics 99 (2):389-406.
Michael Slote (1982). Is Virtue Possible? Analysis 42 (2):70 - 76.
Citations of this work BETA
Egbert Hardeman & Henk Jochemsen (2012). Are There Ideological Aspects to the Modernization of Agriculture? Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 25 (5):657-674.
Terence J. Centner (2010). Limitations on the Confinement of Food Animals in the United States. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 23 (5):469-486.
Similar books and articles
Luc Boltanski (1999). Distant Suffering: Morality, Media, and Politics. Cambridge University Press.
Timothy M. Costelloe (2003). The Invisibility of Evil: Moral Progress and the 'Animal Holocaust'. Philosophical Papers 32 (2):109-131.
Alexander A. Guerrero (2007). Don't Know, Don't Kill: Moral Ignorance, Culpability, and Caution. Philosophical Studies 136 (1):59-97.
Rose Zuzworsky (2001). From the Marketplace to the Dinner Plate: The Economy, Theology, and Factory Farming. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 29 (1-2):177 - 188.
Andrew Linzey (2009). Why Animal Suffering Matters: Philosophy, Theology, and Practical Ethics. Oxford University Press.
Mark H. Bernstein (2004). Without a Tear: Our Tragic Relationship with Animals. University of Illinois Press.
Evelyn B. Pluhar (2010). Meat and Morality: Alternatives to Factory Farming. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 23 (5):455-468.
Adam Shriver (2009). Knocking Out Pain in Livestock: Can Technology Succeed Where Morality has Stalled? Neuroethics 2 (3):115-124.
Gideon Rosen (2002). Culpability and Ignorance. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 103 (1):61–84.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads113 ( #34,188 of 1,907,232 )
Recent downloads (6 months)11 ( #59,903 of 1,907,232 )
How can I increase my downloads?