A most methodical lover?: On scotus's arbitrary creator
Journal of the History of Philosophy 38 (2):169-202 (2000)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,875 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesRichard Cross (1999). Duns Scotus. Oxford University Press.
Richard Cross (1998). The Physics of Duns Scotus: The Scientific Context of a Theological Vision. Clarendon Press.
Jerome Gellman (2000). Prospects for a Sound Stage 3 of Cosmological Arguments. Religious Studies 36 (2):195-201.
Frank Ankersmit (2012). Foreword: Imagination and Fact : A Lover's Quarrel. In Ranjan Ghosh (ed.), Lover's Quarrel with the Past: Romance, Representation, Reading. Berghahn Books.
Michael D. Robinson (2009). Truth in Metaphysics. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 83 (4):467-490.
Richard Cross (2010). Recent Work on the Philosophy of Duns Scotus. Philosophy Compass 5 (8):667-675.
Alfred Landé (1971). The Decline and Fall of Quantum Dualism. Philosophy of Science 38 (2):221-223.
Thomas Williams (1998). The Unmitigated Scotus. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 80 (2):162-181.
Allan B. Wolter (2003). The Unshredded Scotus. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 77 (3):315-356.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads6 ( #147,054 of 556,837 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
