Philosophia 35 (3-4):407-425 (2007)
|Abstract||The plurality of models of ultimate reality is a central problem for religious philosophy. This essay sketches what is involved in mounting comparative inquiries across the plurality of models. In order to illustrate what advance would look like in such a comparative inquiry, an argument is presented to show that highly anthropomorphic models of ultimate reality are inferior to a number of competitors. This paper was delivered as a keynote address during the APA Pacific 2007 Mini-Conference on Models of God|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Stephen Palmquist (2008). Kant's Moral Panentheism. Philosophia 36 (1):17-28.
Christian Hennig (2010). Mathematical Models and Reality: A Constructivist Perspective. [REVIEW] Foundations of Science 15 (1):29-48.
Samuel Ruhmkorff (2007). The Descriptive Criterion and Models of God-Modeling: Response to Hustwit's “Can Models of God Compete?”. Philosophia 35 (3-4):441-444.
Ted Peters (2007). Models of God. Philosophia 35 (3-4):273-288.
Robert I. Damper (2001). Programs, Models, Theories, and Reality. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (6):1055-1056.
Jeanine Diller & Asa Kasher (eds.) (forthcoming). Models of God and Other Kinds of Ultimate Reality. Springer.
Jeremy R. Hustwit (2007). Can Models of God Compete? Philosophia 35 (3-4):433-439.
James E. Taylor (2007). Response to Ted Peters' “Models of God”. Philosophia 35 (3-4):289-292.
Michael V. Antony (forthcoming). Can We Acquire Knowledge of Ultimate Reality? In Jeanine Diller & Asa Kasher (eds.), Models of God and Other Ultimate Realities. Springer.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads6 ( #154,629 of 722,750 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,247 of 722,750 )
How can I increase my downloads?