Calibration and Convexity: Response to Gregory Wheeler
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 63 (4):851-857 (2012)
| Abstract | This note responds to some criticisms of my recent book In Defence of Objective Bayesianism that were provided by Gregory Wheeler in his ‘Objective Bayesian Calibration and the Problem of Non-convex Evidence’ | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesGregory Wheeler (2012). Objective Bayesian Calibration and the Problem of Non-Convex Evidence. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 63 (4):841-850.
Gregory Wheeler & Jon Williamson (2011). Evidential Probability and Objective Bayesian Epistemology. In Prasanta S. Bandyopadhyay & Malcolm Forster (eds.), Handbook of the Philosophy of Statistics. Elsevier.
Daniel Steel (2001). Bayesian Statistics in Radiocarbon Calibration. Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association 2001 (3):S153-.
Frank Lad (1984). The Calibration Question. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 35 (3):213-221.
Teddy Seidenfeld (1985). Calibration, Coherence, and Scoring Rules. Philosophy of Science 52 (2):274-294.
Gregory Wheeler (2005). Book Review Change, Choice and Inference. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 72 (3):498-503.
Gregory Wheeler (2012). Introduction. Synthese 186 (2):443-446.
Gregory Wheeler (2012). Erratum To: Introduction. Synthese 187 (2):815-815.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2012-05-04Total downloads0Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
