Computer decision-support systems for public argumentation: assessing deliberative legitimacy [Book Review]
AI and Society 19 (3):203-228 (2004)
|Abstract||Recent proposals for computer-assisted argumentation have drawn on dialectical models of argumentation. When used to assist public policy planning, such systems also raise questions of political legitimacy. Drawing on deliberative democratic theory, we elaborate normative criteria for deliberative legitimacy and illustrate their use for assessing two argumentation systems. Full assessment of such systems requires experiments in which system designers draw on expertise from the social sciences and enter into the policy deliberation itself at the level of participants|
|Keywords||Argumentation Computer-mediated decisions Decision support systems|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
John Parkinson (2006). Deliberating in the Real World: Problems of Legitimacy in Deliberative Democracy. OUP Oxford.
Kristoffer Ahlstrom-Vij (2012). Why Deliberative Democracy is (Still) Untenable. Public Affairs Quarterly 26 (3).
Fabienne Peter (2007). Democratic Legitimacy and Proceduralist Social Epistemology. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 6 (3):329-353.
Nancy Green (2012). Argumentation and Risk Communication About Genetic Testing: Challenges for Healthcare Consumers and Implications for Computer Systems. Journal of Argumentation in Context 1 (1):113-129.
Karen A. Forcht, Daphyne Thomas & Karen Wigginton (1989). Computer Crime: Assessing the Lawyer's Perspective. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 8 (4):243 - 251.
Jon Garthoff (2010). Legitimacy is Not Authority. Law and Philosophy 29 (6):669-694.
Summer Johnson (2007). Making Public Bioethics Sufficiently Public: The Legitimacy and Authority of Bioethics Commissions. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 17 (2):143-152.
Douglas Walton (2012). Computational Dialectic and Rhetorical Invention. AI and Society 26 (1):2011.
Fabienne Peter (2007). Rawls' Idea of Public Reason and Democratic Legitimacy. Journal of International Political Theory 3 (1):129-143.
Susan Dodds & Rachel A. Ankeny (2006). Regulation of hESC Research in Australia: Promises and Pitfalls for Deliberative Democratic Approaches. [REVIEW] Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 3 (1-2):95-107.
Joshua W. Houston (2009). Contestation and Deliberation Within. Social Philosophy Today 25:241-253.
Added to index2010-08-30
Total downloads4 ( #188,769 of 722,745 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,247 of 722,745 )
How can I increase my downloads?