Choosing Life, Choosing Death: The Tyranny of Autonomy in Medical Ethics and Law

Abstract
Since the 1960s we have moved rapidly from a “doctor-knows-best” society which in which medical paternalism -- such as withholding information from patients “for their benefit” -- was common, towards a society which celebrates patients’ rights to make informed decisions about their care. In Choosing Life, Choosing Death, <span class='Hi'>Charles</span> Foster mounts a polemic against the current enthusiasm for respect for autonomy in medical ethics and law.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index Translate to english
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 12,088
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Similar books and articles
Martin Gunderson (1993). Physician Assisted Death and Hard Choices. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 18 (3):329-341.
B. A. Stoll (1990). Choosing Between Cancer Patients. Journal of Medical Ethics 16 (2):71-74.
Shelly Kagan (2012). Death. Yale University Press.
Prakash N. Desai (1988). Medical Ethics in India. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 13 (3):231-255.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2010-12-22

Total downloads

9 ( #165,686 of 1,101,958 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #306,569 of 1,101,958 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.