David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Modern Schoolman 89 (3/4):181-188 (2012)
Anselm had a particular interest in the art of painting. He saw a close analogy between physical beauty and rational beauty. Both can be represented—physical beauty by paintings, rational beauty through discourse—and Anselm was especially attentive to the possibility of misrepresentation. Deceptive rhetorical coloring can mislead; unworthy discourse can obscure the truth’s inherent beauty. Yet even when discourse does justice to the beauty it is intended to represent, Anselm places strict limits on the appeal to beauty. For beauty by itself is not reliably persuasive. To one who is already persuaded, however, an appreciation of the rational beauty of the truth strengthens understanding, giving the believer a first-hand feel for the truth that is unmediated by argument. Just as Anselm says Credo ut intelligam, I believe in order that I might understand, so too he could say Credo ut mirer, I believe in order that I might be awe-struck
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Michael J. O'Neill (2006). A Peculiar “Faith”: On R.G. Collingwood's Use of Saint Anselm's Argument. Saint Anselm Journal 3 (2):32-47.
Mark Owen Webb (2005). In Defense of Anselm. Philo 8 (1):55-58.
Ian Logan (2008). Reading Anselm's Proslogion: The History of Anselm's Argument and its Significance Today. Ashgate Pub. Ltd..
Thomas Williams (2009). Anselm on Freedom. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2009.
Thomas Williams, Saint Anselm. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Chris Heathwood (2011). The Relevance of Kant's Objection to Anselm's Ontological Argument. Religious Studies 47 (3):345-357.
Jasper Hopkins (1983). Anselm on Freedom and the Will. Philosophy Research Archives 9:471-493.
Paschal Baumstein (2007). Anselm of Canterbury and the Beauty of Theology. By David S. Hogg and Anselm of Canterbury and His Theological Inheritance. By Giles E. M. Gasper. [REVIEW] Heythrop Journal 48 (1):122–124.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads41 ( #106,433 of 1,934,933 )
Recent downloads (6 months)10 ( #52,983 of 1,934,933 )
How can I increase my downloads?