Designer babies', instrumentalisation and the child's right to an open future
In Nafsika Athanassoulis (ed.), Philosophical Reflections on Medical Ethics. Palgrave Macmillan (2005)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,672 |
| External links | This entry has no external links. Add one. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesClaudia Mills (2003). The Child's Right to an Open Future? Journal of Social Philosophy 34 (4):499–509.
Elizabeth Barnes & Ross Cameron (2009). The Open Future: Bivalence, Determinism and Ontology. Philosophical Studies 146 (2):291 - 309.
Helga Kuhse (2001). Should Cloning Be Banned for the Sake of the Child? Poiesis and Praxis 1 (1):17-33.
Stephen Wilkinson (2010). Choosing Tomorrow's Children: The Ethics of Selective Reproduction. OUP Oxford.
H. Biggs (2004). Designer Babies: Where Should We Draw the Line? Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (6):e5-e5.
Ian Hunt (1999). Designer Babies. Professional Ethics 7 (3/4):67-83.
Mike Williams (2003). Designer Babies. Philosophy Now 41:43-43.
Kyle Scott (2010). Blood Matters: From Inherited Illness to Designer Babies, How the World and I Found Ourselves in the Future of the Gene. Masha Gessen. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2008. 336 Pages. Hardback. ISBN 978-0151013623. RRP: £18.99. [REVIEW] Human Reproduction and Genetic Ethics 16 (1):127-129.
Tuija Takala (2007). Designer Babies and Treating People as a Means. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 1:245-249.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads0Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
