Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (4):709-710 (2001)
|Abstract||Roger Shepard's description of an abstract representational space defined by landmark objects and kinematic transformations between them fails to successfully capture the essence of the perceptual tasks he expects of it, such as object recognition. Ultimately, objects are recognized in the context of events. The dynamic nature of events is what determines the perceived kinematic behavior, and it is at the level of dynamics that events can be classified as types. [Shepard].|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Robert A. M. Gregson (2000). Chaotic Dynamics and Psychophysical Parallelism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):541-542.
Horst Krist (2001). The Internalization of Physical Constraints From a Developmental Perspective. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (4):681-682.
A. H. Wertheim (1999). Motion Percepts: “Sense Specific,” “Kinematic,” or . . . ? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (2):338-340.
J. Alex Shull & Geoffrey P. Bingham (2001). Two Visual Systems Must Still Perceive Events. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (1):118-119.
Dejan Todorovic (2001). Is Kinematic Geometry an Internalized Regularity? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (4):641-651.
G. Granek (2000). Poincare's Contributions to Relativistic Dynamics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 31 (1):15-48.
Lydia McGrew (2010). Probability Kinematics and Probability Dynamics. Journal of Philosophical Research 35:89-105.
Robert Schwartz (2001). Evolutionary Internalized Regularities. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (4):626-628.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads1 ( #275,053 of 549,754 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?