Defending Poetry: Art and Ethics in Joseph Brodsky, Seamus Heaney, and Geoffrey Hill
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
OUP Oxford (2010)
Defending Poetry studies the tradition of poetic defence, or apologia, as it has been pursued and developed by three of the twentieth century's leading poet-critics: Joseph Brodsky, Seamus Heaney, and Geoffrey Hill. It begins with an extended introduction to philosophical debates over the ethical value of literature from Plato to Levinas and continues by situating these three poets as in one sense historically continuous with the defences of Horace, Sidney, Coleridge, and Shelley, but also as drastically other. This otherness is bounded on one side by the example of T. S. Eliot's career-long contemplation of the ideal of poetic 'integrity', and on the other by a collective recognition of the twentieth century's great horrors, which seem to corrode all associations of art and the good. Through close readings of the poems and prose essays of Brodsky, Heaney, and Hill, Defending Poetry makes a timely intervention in current debates about literature's ethics, arguing that any ethics of literature ought to take into account not only poetry, but also the writings of poets on the value of poetry.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Christopher Mole (2013). The Performative Limits of Poetry. British Journal of Aesthetics 53 (1):55-70.
Emily Taylor Merriman (2009). Raging with the Truth: Condemnation and Concealment in the Poetry of Blake and Hill. Journal of Religious Ethics 37 (1):83-103.
Maximilian de Gaynesford (2009). Incense and Insensibility: Austin on the 'Non-Seriousness' of Poetry. Ratio 22 (4):464-485.
Irene Gilsenan Nordin (2002). Nihilism in Seamus Heaney. Philosophy and Literature 26 (2):405-414.
Laura Penny (2008). The Highest of All the Arts: Kant and Poetry. Philosophy and Literature 32 (2):pp. 373-384.
Kalliopi Nikolopoulou (2009). Plato and Hegel on an Old Quarrel. Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 13 (2):249-266.
Joseph Acquisto (ed.) (2013). Thinking Poetry: Philosophical Approaches to Nineteenth-Century French Poetry. Palgrave Macmillan.
Marjorie Perloff (1996). Wittgenstein's Ladder: Poetic Language and the Strangeness of the Ordinary. University of Chicago Press.
Hugo Meynell (2011). An Unexpected Light: Theology and Witness in the Poetry and Thought of Charles Williams, Micheal O'Siadhail, and Geoffrey Hill. By David C. Mahan. Heythrop Journal 52 (6):1078-1079.
Mark Edmundson (1995). Defending Wordsworth, Defending Poetry. Philosophy and Literature 19 (2):207-213.
Günter Figal (2003). Image and Word. Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 7 (2):251-259.
Mark Edmundson (1995). Literature Against Philosophy, Plato to Derrida: A Defence of Poetry. Cambridge University Press.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-01-31
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?