Evolution, Sociobiology, and the Atonement

Zygon 33 (4):557-570 (1998)
This essay views Christian doctrines of the atonement in the light of evolution and sociobiology. It argues that most of the doctrines are false because they use a false premise, the historicity of Adam and the Fall. However, two doctrines are not false on those grounds: Abelard’s idea that Jesus’ life is an example and Athanasius’s concept that the atonement changes human nature. Employing evolution’s and sociobiology’s concepts of the egocentric and ethnocentric nature of humanity and the synergy between genes and environments to produce a "nature," this essay shows that these two doctrines can be amalgamated to make sense of the atonement in the late twentieth century
Keywords Abelard   Athanasius   atonement   evolution   human nature   sociobiology   Abelard   Athanasius   atonement   evolution   human nature   sociobiology   Abelard   Athanasius   atonement   evolution   human nature   sociobiology
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/0591-2385.00174
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 16,661
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Steven S. Aspenson (1996). Swinburne on Atonement. Religious Studies 32 (2):187 - 204.
Jason M. Byron (2005). Sociobiology. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Vincent Brümmer (1992). Atonement and Reconciliation. Religious Studies 28 (4):435 - 452.
David Mcnaughton (1992). Reparation and Atonement. Religious Studies 28 (2):129 - 144.
Thomas Williams (2004). Sin, Grace, and Redemption in Abelard. In Kevin Guilfoy & Jeffrey Brower (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Abelard. Cambridge University Press 258-278.
Tim Bayne & Greg Restall (2009). A Participatory Model of the Atonement. In Yujin Nagasawa & Erik J. Wielenberg (eds.), New Waves in Philosophy of Religion. Palgrave Macmillan 150.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

14 ( #184,535 of 1,726,249 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #369,877 of 1,726,249 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.