Exploring Why and How Journal Editors Retract Articles: Findings From a Qualitative Study

Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (1):1-11 (2013)
Abstract Editors have a responsibility to retract seriously flawed articles from their journals. However, there appears to be little consistency in journals’ policies or procedures for this. In a qualitative study, we therefore interviewed editors of science journals using semi-structured interviews to investigate their experience of retracting articles. We identified potential barriers to retraction, difficulties in the process and also sources of support and encouragement. Our findings have been used as the basis for guidelines developed by the Committee on Publication Ethics
Keywords Retractions  Reasons  Medical research
Categories
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 5,865
External links
  • Through your library Configure

    Similar books and articles
    P. J. D. Drenth (2006). Responsible Conduct in Research. Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (1):13-21.

    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2011-07-15

    Total downloads

    3 ( #203,804 of 556,815 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    1 ( #64,847 of 556,815 )

    How can I increase my downloads?


    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.

    Other forums