David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
History and Philosophy of Logic 15 (2):211-225 (1994)
This paper attempts to confine the preconceptions that prevented Frege from appreciating Hilbert?s Grundlagen der Geometrie to two: (i) Frege?s reliance on what, following Wilfrid Hodges, I call a Frege?Peano language, and (ii) Frege?s view that the sense of an expression wholly determines its reference.I argue that these two preconceptions prevented Frege from achieving the conceptual structure of model theory, whereas Hilbert, at least in his practice, was quite close to the model?theoretic point of view.Moreover, the issues that divided Frege and Hilbert did not revolve around whether one or the other allowed metalogical notions.Frege, e.g., succeeded in formulating the notion of logical consequence, at least to the extent that Bolzano did; the point is rather that even though Frege had certain semantic concepts, he did not articulate them model?theoretically, whereas, in some limited sense, Hilbert did
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
David De Vidi & Graham Solomon (1994). Geometric Conventionalism and Carnap's Principle of Tolerance. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 25 (5):773-783.
Adrian Heathcote (2014). On the Exhaustion of Mathematical Entities by Structures. Axiomathes 24 (2):167-180.
Jose Saguillo (2009). Methodological Practice and Complementary Concepts of Logical Consequence: Tarski's Model-Theoretic Consequence and Corcoran's Information-Theoretic Consequence. History and Philosophy of Logic 30 (1):21-48.
Ansten Klev (2011). Dedekind and Hilbert on the Foundations of the Deductive Sciences. Review of Symbolic Logic 4 (4):645-681.
Similar books and articles
Stewart Shapiro (2005). Categories, Structures, and the Frege-Hilbert Controversy: The Status of Meta-Mathematics. Philosophia Mathematica 13 (1):61-77.
David Hilbert (1899). Letter to Frege, 29.Xii.1899. In Gottfried Gabriel, Hans Hermes, Friedrich Kambartel, Christian Thiel, Albert Veraart, Brian McGuinness & Hans Kaal (eds.), Gottlob Frege: Philosophical and Mathematical Correspondence. 38--41.
William Demopoulus & William Bell (1993). Frege's Theory of Concepts and Objects and the Interpretation of Second-Order Logict. Philosophia Mathematica 1 (2):139-156.
Stewart Shapiro (1996). Space, Number and Structure: A Tale of Two Debates. Philosophia Mathematica 4 (2):148-173.
Guillermo E. Rosado Haddock (1986). On Frege's Two Notions of Sense. History and Philosophy of Logic 7 (1):31-41.
G. Aldo Antonelli & Robert C. May (2000). Frege's New Science. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 41 (3):242-270.
Patricia A. Blanchette (2007). Frege on Consistency and Conceptual Analysis. Philosophia Mathematica 15 (3):321-346.
Kai F. Wehmeier (1997). Aspekte der frege–hilbert-korrespondenz. History and Philosophy of Logic 18 (4):201-209.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads17 ( #101,772 of 1,099,914 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #304,017 of 1,099,914 )
How can I increase my downloads?