David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 8 (4):559-574 (2005)
Abstract This essay explores the matter of hegemony in the global system from the standpoint of global capitalism theory, in contrast to extant approaches that analyse this phenomenon from the standpoint of the nation?state and the inter?state system. It advances a conception of global hegemony in transnational social terms, linking the process of globalisation to the construction of hegemonies and counter?hegemonies in the twenty?first century. An emergent global capitalist historical bloc, lead by a transnational capitalist class, rather than a particular nation?state, bloc of states, or region, is pursuing a hegemonic project. The US state is seen as the point of condensation for pressures from dominant groups to resolve problems of global capitalism. US?led militarisation is a contradictory political?military response to the crisis of global capitalism, characterised by economic stagnation, legitimacy problems and the rise of counter?hegemonic forces
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Mark Rigstad, The 'Bush Doctrine' as a Hegemonic Discourse Strategy. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy.
Nitsan Chorev & Sarah Babb (2009). The Crisis of Neoliberalism and the Future of International Institutions: A Comparison of the IMF and the WTO. [REVIEW] Theory and Society 38 (5):459-484.
Similar books and articles
Martin Albrow (1996/1997). The Global Age: State and Society Beyond Modernity. Stanford University Press.
Roger Burbach & William I. Robinson (1999). The Fin De Siede Debate: Globalization as Epochal Shift. Science and Society 63 (1):10 - 39.
William I. Robinson & Jerry Harris (2000). Towards a Global Ruling Class? Globalization and the Transnational Capitalist Class. Science and Society 64 (1):11 - 54.
Ahmet Öncü (2003). Dictatorship Plus Hegemony: A Gramscian Analysis of the Turkish State. Science and Society 67 (3):303 - 328.
Alexander Anievas (2008). Theory of the Global State: Globality as an Unfinished Revolution A Theory of Global Capitalism: Production, Class, and the State in a Transnational World. Historical Materialism 16 (2):190-206.
William I. Robinson (2001). Global Capitalism and Nation-State-Centric Thinking — What We Dont See When We Do See Nation-States: Response to Critics. Science and Society 65 (4):500 - 508.
Peter Ives (2009). Global English, Hegemony and Education: Lessons From Gramsci. Educational Philosophy and Theory 41 (6):661-683.
Ivan Manokha (2006). Business Ethics and the Spirit of Global Capitalism: Moral Leadership in the Context of Global Hegemony. Journal of Global Ethics 2 (1):27 – 41.
A. Claire Cutler (2005). Gramsci, Law, and the Culture of Global Capitalism. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 8 (4):527-542.
William I. Robinson (2005). Global Capitalism: The New Transnationalism and the Folly of Conventional Thinking. Science and Society 69 (3):316 - 328.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads32 ( #79,541 of 1,696,808 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #72,060 of 1,696,808 )
How can I increase my downloads?