David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Sophia 47 (3):265-279 (2008)
To address the theological turn in phenomenology, this paper sets out critical arguments opposing the theist phenomenology of Michel Henry and Gilles Deleuze’s philosophy of the event. Henry’s phenomenology has been overlooked in recent commentaries compared with, for example, Jean-Luc Marion’s work. It will be shown here that Henry’s philosophy presents a detailed novel turn in phenomenology structured according to critical moves against positions developed from Husserl, Heidegger, and Merleau-Ponty. This demonstration is done through a strong contrast with Deleuze and a short engagement with Quentin Meillassoux. The paper presents an argument against the theological turn on the grounds that it misunderstands the form of affectivity when compared to Deleuze’s work on affect and event. It will be argued that Henry’s search for a free-standing affect deduced as a condition for any appearance underplays the way any affect is included in many causal and transcendentally determined series such that any notion of the pure affect independent of other processes is a fiction. The loss of this pure affect entails the questioning of the theological turn in Henry.
|Keywords||Affect Auto-affection Event Gilles Deleuze Michel Henry Transcendental Suffering|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Rene Descartes (2004). Meditations on First Philosophy. Caravan Books.
I. Kant (1984). Critique of Pure Reason. Philosophy 59 (230):555-557.
Søren Kierkegaard (1992). Concluding Unscientific Postscript to Philosophical Fragments. Princeton University Press.
Jack Reynolds & Jon Roffe (2006). Deleuze and Merleau-Ponty: Immanence, Univocity and Phenomenology. Journal of the British Society of Phenomenology 37 (3):228-51.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
James Williams (2010). Against Oblivion and Simple Empiricism. Journal of Philosophy: A Cross-Disciplinary Inquiry 5 (11):25-34.
Taylor Hammer (2007). The Role of Ontology in the Philosophy of Gilles Deleuze. Southern Journal of Philosophy 45 (1):57-77.
David R. Cole (2011). The Actions of Affect in Deleuze: Others Using Language and the Language That We Make .. Educational Philosophy and Theory 43 (6):549-561.
Frédéric Seyler (2009). Michel Henry et la critique du politique. Studia Phaenomenologica 9:351-377.
José Ruiz Fernández (2009). Logos and Immanence in Michel Henry's Phenomenology. Studia Phaenomenologica 9:83-95.
Julia Scheidegger (2009). Michel Henrys Lebensphänomenologie als Hermeneutikkritik. Studia Phaenomenologica 9:59-82.
Mihail Neamţu (2001). „Născut, iar nu făcut“ Note despre filozofia Revelaţiei la Michel Henry. Studia Phaenomenologica 1 (3-4):391-416.
Joseph Rivera (2011). Generation, Interiority and the Phenomenology of Christianity in Michel Henry. Continental Philosophy Review 44 (2):205-235.
James Williams (2009). If Not Here, Then Where? On the Location and Individuation of Events in Badiou and Deleuze. Deleuze Studies 3 (1):97-123.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads62 ( #69,109 of 1,906,946 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #200,756 of 1,906,946 )
How can I increase my downloads?