Hertz, Boltzmann and Wittgenstein reconsidered
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 20 (2):245-263 (1989)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJohn Preston (2006). Janik on Hertz and the Early Wittgenstein. Grazer Philosophische Studien 73 (1):83-95.
Henk Visser (1999). Boltzmann and Wittgenstein or How Pictures Became Linguistic. Synthese 119 (1-2):135-156.
Peter C. Kjaergaard (2002). Hertz and Wittgenstein's Philosophy of Science. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 33 (1):121-149.
Allan Janik (1994). How Did Hertz Influence Wittgenstein's Philosophical Development? Grazer Philosophische Studien 49:19-47.
John Blackmore (1999). Boltzmann and Epistemology. Synthese 119 (1-2):157-189.
Henk W. de Regt (1999). Ludwig Boltzmann's Bildtheorie and Scientific Understanding. Synthese 119 (1-2):113-134.
Gustav Jäger, Josef Nabl & Stephan Meyer (1999). Three Assistants on Boltzmann. Synthese 119 (1-2):69-84.
Massimiliano Badino (2011). Mechanistic Slumber Vs. Statistical Insomnia: The Early Phase of Boltzmann’s H-Theorem (1868-1877). European Physical Journal - H 36 (3):353-378.
Peter Barker (1980). Hertz and Wittgenstein. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 11 (3):243-256.
Allan Janik (forthcoming). Paul Engelmann's Role In Wittgenstein's Philosophical Development. Grazer Philosophische Studien:279-295.
Frederik Voetmann Christiansen (2006). Heinrich Hertz's Neo-Kantian Philosophy of Science, and its Development by Harald Høffding. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 37 (1):1 - 20.
Andreas Hüttemann (2009). Pluralism and the Hypothetical in Heinrich Hertz’s Philosophy of Science. In Michael Heidelberger & Gregor Schiemann (eds.), The Significance of the Hypothetical in the Natural Sciences. de Gruyter.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-09-02Total downloads27 ( #45,806 of 549,122 )Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,390 of 549,122 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
