History and Philosophy of Logic 7 (2):123-142 (1986)
|Abstract||This paper analyses the relationship between Hobbes's theory of language and his theory of science and method. It is shown that Hobbes, at least in his Computatio sive Logica (1655), deviates in some measure from the traditional (Aristotelian) model of language. In this model speech is considered to be a fairly unproblematic expression of thought, which itself is independent of language. Basing himself on a nominalist account of universals, Hobbes states that the demonstration or assertion of universal propositions presupposes speech (more especially, the use of names as marks). This insight turns out to be essential for Hobbes's (rationalist) view of scientific method|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Helen Thornton (2005). State of Nature or Eden?: Thomas Hobbes and His Contemporaries on the Natural Condition of Human Beings. University of Rochester Press.
By John Whipple (2008). Hobbes on Miracles. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 89 (1):117–142.
Michael Moehler (2009). Why Hobbes' State of Nature is Best Modeled by an Assurance Game. Utilitas 21 (3):297-326.
Stephen Finn (2001). Geometry and the Science of Morality in Hobbes. Social Philosophy Today 17:57-66.
Margarita Costa (2011). Language as a Factor of Integration or Segregation in Modern States. Hobbes Studies 24 (1):15-23.
David P. Gauthier (1969). I. Yet Another Hobbes. Inquiry 12 (1-4):449-465.
Richard Bourke (2009). Book Symposium: Hobbes and Political Theory Introduction: Hobbes, Language and Liberty. Hobbes Studies 22 (2):161-170.
Gordon Hull (2006). Hobbes's Radical Nominalism. Epoché 11 (1):201-223.
Stewart Duncan (2011). Hobbes, Signification, and Insignificant Names. Hobbes Studies 24 (2):158-178.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads24 ( #51,551 of 548,984 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #25,729 of 548,984 )
How can I increase my downloads?