David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Synthese 92 (1):83 - 99 (1992)
The existence of an idea of a missing shade of blue contradicts Hume's first principle that simple ideas all derive from corresponding simple impressions. Hume dismisses the exception to his principle as unimportant. Why does he do so? His later account of distinctions of reason suggests a systematic way of dealing with simple ideas not derived from simple impressions. Why does he not return to the problem of the missing shade, having offered that account? Several suggestions as to Hume's solution of the problem of the missing shade (not all appealing to distinctions of reason) are explored with an eye both to their adequacy as Humean solutions and their value as clues to his dismissal of the problem. Hypotheses concerning the latter perplexity are formulated and discussed as well. Senses in which the missing shade of blue is or may be a red herring are identified. In course, this author names Hume's missing shade marjorie grene. Historians of philosophy will want to adopt this nomenclature.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Ludwig Wittgenstein (1969/1991). On Certainty (Ed. Anscombe and von Wright). Harper Torchbooks.
Immanuel Kant (2007/1991). Critique of Pure Reason. In Elizabeth Schmidt Radcliffe, Richard McCarty, Fritz Allhoff & Anand Vaidya (eds.), Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. Blackwell Pub. Ltd. 449-451.
David Hume (1977). Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. Clarendon Press.
Barry Stroud (1977/1999). Hume. Routledge.
Donald W. Livingston (1984). Hume's Philosophy of Common Life. University of Chicago Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Nancy Kendrick (2009). Why Hume's Counterexample is Insignificant and Why It is Not. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 17 (5):955 – 979.
Ruth Weintraub (2007). Separability and Concept-Empiricism: Hume Vs. Locke. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 15 (4):729 – 743.
Similar books and articles
Timm Triplett (2007). Tye's Missing Shade of Blue. Analysis 67 (294):166–170.
Robert C. Cummins (1978). The Missing Shade of Blue. Philosophical Review 87 (October):548-565.
Eric Schliesser (2004). Hume's Missing Shade of Blue Reconsidered From a Newtonian Perspective. Journal of Scottish Philosophy 2 (2):164-175.
Thomas M. Lennon (1979). Hume's Ontological Ambivalence and the Missing Shade of Blue. Southern Journal of Philosophy 17 (1):77-84.
Reginald O. Savage (1992). Hume's Missing Shade of Blue. History of Philosophy Quarterly 9 (2):199 - 206.
Karánn Durland (1996). Hume's First Principle, His Missing Shade, and His Distinctions of Reason. Hume Studies 22 (1):105-121.
John Morreall (1982). Hume's Missing Shade of Blue. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 42 (March):407-415.
D. M. Johnson (1984). Hume's Missing Shade of Blue, Interpreted as Involving Habitual Spectra. Hume Studies 10 (2):109-124.
John O. Nelson (1989). Hume's Missing Shade of Blue Re-Viewed. Hume Studies 15 (2):353-363.
Robert J. Fogelin (1984). Hume and the Missing Shade of Blue. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 45 (December):263-272.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads87 ( #38,329 of 1,726,249 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #84,767 of 1,726,249 )
How can I increase my downloads?