David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Cambridge University Press (2012)
When people speak, their words never fully encode what they mean, and the context is always compatible with a variety of interpretations. How can comprehension ever be achieved? Wilson and Sperber argue that comprehension is an inference process guided by precise expectations of relevance. What are the relations between the linguistically encoded meanings studied in semantics and the thoughts that humans are capable of entertaining and conveying? How should we analyse literal meaning, approximations, metaphors and ironies? Is the ability to understand speakers' meanings rooted in a more general human ability to understand other minds? How do these abilities interact in evolution and in cognitive development? MEANING AND RELEVANCE sets out to answer these and other questions, enriching and updating relevance theory and exploring its implications for linguistics, philosophy, cognitive science and literary studies
|Keywords||Semantics Relevance Inference Cognition Pragmatics|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$71.98 used (32% off) $91.79 new (21% off) $114.99 direct from Amazon Amazon page|
|Call number||P325.W479 2012|
|ISBN(s)||052176677X 9780521747486 9780521766777|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Elmar Geir Unnsteinsson (2015). Wittgenstein as a Gricean Intentionalist. British Journal for the History of Philosophy:1-18.
Kendall L. Walton (forthcoming). Meiosis, Hyperbole, Irony. Philosophical Studies:1-16.
Adam R. Crossley & Rebecca Lawthom (2015). Dialogical Demand: Discursive Position Repertoires for a Local and Global UK Sex Industry. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 45 (2):261-286.
Elmar Geir Unnsteinsson (2014). Compositionality and Sandbag Semantics. Synthese 191 (14):3329-3350.
Steve Oswald & Alain Rihs (2014). Metaphor as Argument: Rhetorical and Epistemic Advantages of Extended Metaphors. [REVIEW] Argumentation 28 (2):133-159.
Similar books and articles
Timothy Williamson (2009). Reference, Inference, and the Semantics of Pejoratives. In Joseph Almog & Paolo Leonardi (eds.), The Philosophy of David Kaplan. Oxford University Press 137--159.
Ray S. Jackendoff (1983). Semantics And Cognition. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Claudia Maienborn, Klaus von Heusinger & Paul Portner (eds.) (2011). Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning. De Gruyter Mouton.
Noam Chomsky (1958). Logical Syntax and Semantics. Their Linguistic Relevance. Journal of Symbolic Logic 23 (1):72-72.
Scott Soames (2009). Philosophical Essays: Natural Language: What It Means and How We Use It. Princeton University Press.
Sándor G. J. Hervey (1979). Axiomatic Semantics: A Theory of Linguistic Semantics. Scottish Academic Press.
Corinne Iten (2005). Linguistic Meaning, Truth Conditions and Relevance: The Case of Concessives. Palgrave Macmillan.
Edwin D. Mares (1992). Semantics for Relevance Logic with Identity. Studia Logica 51 (1):1 - 20.
Pierrette Bouillon & Federica Busa (eds.) (2001). The Language of Word Meaning. Cambridge University Press.
Chris Fox (2005). Foundations of Intensional Semantics. Blackwell Pub..
Added to index2011-08-24
Total downloads10 ( #228,082 of 1,725,598 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #211,030 of 1,725,598 )
How can I increase my downloads?