Graduate studies at Western
Mind 119 (475):657-748 (2010)
|Abstract||Necessitism is the view that necessarily everything is necessarily something; contingentism is the negation of necessitism. The dispute between them is reminiscent of, but clearer than, the more familiar one between possibilism and actualism. A mapping often used to ‘translate’ actualist discourse into possibilist discourse is adapted to map every sentence of a first-order modal language to a sentence the contingentist (but not the necessitist) may regard as equivalent to it but which is neutral in the dispute. This mapping enables the necessitist to extract a ‘cash value’ from what the contingentist says. Similarly, a mapping often used to ‘translate’ possibilist discourse into actualist discourse is adapted to map every sentence of the language to a sentence the necessitist (but not the contingentist) may regard as equivalent to it but which is neutral in the dispute. This mapping enables the contingentist to extract a ‘cash value’ from what the necessitist says. Neither mapping is a translation in the usual sense, since necessitists and contingentists use the same language with the same meanings. The former mapping is extended to a second-order modal language under a plural interpretation of the second-order variables. It is proved that the latter mapping cannot be. Thus although the necessitist can extract a ‘cash value’ from what the contingentist says in the second-order language, the contingentist cannot extract a ‘cash value’ from some of what the necessitist says, even when it raises significant questions. This poses contingentism a serious challenge|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Peter Fritz (2013). Modal Ontology and Generalized Quantifiers. Journal of Philosophical Logic 42 (4):643-678.
Kristie Miller (2013). Properties in a Contingentist's Domain. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 94 (2):225-245.
Helen Morris Cartwright (1993). On Plural Reference and Elementary Set Theory. Synthese 96 (2):201 - 254.
Hannes Leitgeb (2001). Truth as Translation – Part A. Journal of Philosophical Logic 30 (4):281-307.
Sonia Roca-Royes (2011). Essentialism Vis-à-Vis Possibilia, Modal Logic, and Necessitism. Philosophy Compass 6 (1):54-64.
Philippe De Rouilhan (2002). On What There Are. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 102:183 - 200.
Øystein Linnebo, Plural Quantification. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Simon Hewitt (2012). The Logic of Finite Order. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 53 (3):297-318.
John Nerbonne (1995). Nominal Comparatives and Generalized Quantifiers. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 4 (4):273-300.
Micah B. Goldwater, Marc T. Tomlinson, Catharine H. Echols & Bradley C. Love (2011). Structural Priming as Structure-Mapping: Children Use Analogies From Previous Utterances to Guide Sentence Production. Cognitive Science 35 (1):156-170.
Arthur Saniotis (2007). Reflections on the "Human Behaviourome": Mind Mapping and its Futures. World Futures 63 (8):611 – 622.
George Boolos (1980). Omega-Consistency and the Diamond. Studia Logica 39 (2-3):237 - 243.
Enrico Martino & Massimiliano Carrara (2010). To Be is to Be the Object of a Possible Act of Choice. Studia Logica 96 (2):289-313.
Wai K. Yeap (2011). How Albot0 Finds Its Way Home: A Novel Approach to Cognitive Mapping Using Robots. Topics in Cognitive Science 3 (4):707-721.
Francesca Boccuni (2013). Plural Logicism. Erkenntnis 78 (5):1051-1067.
Added to index2010-10-31
Total downloads108 ( #6,738 of 739,318 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #20,476 of 739,318 )
How can I increase my downloads?