Philosophy 73 (4):573-592 (1998)
|Abstract||The paper is adressed to Michael Levin's recent Philosophy article ‘Natural Submission, Aristotle on.’ Levin argues that rule by the naturally dominant is for the best and that the naturally submissive ought to accept it as just and even inevitable. I point out some confusions in his attempt to link merit-conferring traits in individuals with social and political dominance and question his conceptions of human welfare, inferiority, and criminality. Certain combinations of competence and forcefulness arise in real-world settings, and they produce a range of outcomes not all of which are either inevitable or desirable.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Michael Levin (1993). Reply to Fulda on Animal Rights. Journal of Value Inquiry 27 (1):111-112.
Michael E. Levin & Margarita R. Levin (1978). Lavoisier's Slow Burn. Philosophy of Science 45 (4):626-629.
Michael E. Levin & Margarita Levin (1979). The Modal Confusion in Rawls' Original Position. Analysis 39 (2):82 - 87.
Michael E. Levin & Margarita Rosa Levin (1977). Flagpoles, Shadows and Deductive Explanation. Philosophical Studies 32 (3):293 - 299.
Michael E. Levin & Margarita R. Levin (1978). The Independence Results of Set Theory: An Informal Exposition. Synthese 38 (1):1 - 34.
Michael Levin (1994). Reply to Adler. Journal of Social Philosophy 25 (2):115-118.
Michael Levin & Max Hocutt (2001). Reply to Keita. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 31 (3):395-403.
Michael Levin (1994). Reply to Adler, Cox and Corlett. Journal of Social Philosophy 25 (1):5-19.
Michael Levin (1984). Reply to Pennock. Philosophy and Public Affairs 13 (3):263-267.
Michael Levin (1997). Natural Subordination, Aristotle On. Philosophy 72 (280):241 - 257.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads6 ( #154,770 of 722,933 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?