David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Synthese 176 (2):291 - 309 (2010)
In contemporary discussions of the Ramsey Test for conditionals, it is commonly held that (i) supposing the antecedent of a conditional is adopting a potential state of full belief, and (ii) Modus Ponens is a valid rule of inference. I argue on the basis of Thomason Conditionals (such as ' If Sally is deceiving, I do not believe it') and Moore's Paradox that both claims are wrong. I then develop a double-indexed Update Semantics for conditionals which takes these two results into account while doing justice to the key intuitions underlying the Ramsey Test. The semantics is extended to cover some further phenomena, including the recent observation that epistemic modal operators give rise to something very like, but also very unlike, Moore's Paradox.
|Keywords||Ramsey Test Suppositional Reasoning Modus Ponens Update Semantics|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Jonathan Bennett (2003). A Philosophical Guide to Conditionals. Oxford University Press.
Isaac Levi (1980). The Enterprise of Knowledge: An Essay on Knowledge, Credal Probability, and Chance. The MIT Press.
Seth Yalcin (2007). Epistemic Modals. Mind 116 (464):983-1026.
Dorothy Edgington (1995). On Conditionals. Mind 104 (414):235-329.
David I. Beaver (2001). Presupposition and Assertion in Dynamic Semantics. Csli Publications.
Citations of this work BETA
Justin Khoo (2016). Probabilities of Conditionals in Context. Linguistics and Philosophy (1):1-43.
John Cantwell (2014). Unity and Autonomy in Expressivist Logic. Dialectica 68 (3):443-457.
Malte Willer (2011). Realizing What Might Be. Philosophical Studies 153 (3):365 - 375.
Richard Stöckle-Schobel (2016). Arguments From Developmental Order. Frontiers in Psychology 7.
Similar books and articles
Gerald J. Erion (2001). The Cartesian Test for Automatism. Minds and Machines 11 (1):29-39.
Richard Bradley (2007). A Defence of the Ramsey Test. Mind 116 (461):1-21.
André Fuhrmann & Isaac Levi (1994). Undercutting and the Ramsey Test for Conditionals. Synthese 101 (2):157-169.
B. H. Slater (2004). Ramsey's Tests. Synthese 141 (3):431-444.
Sten Lindström & Wlodzimierz Rabinowicz (1992). Belief Revision, Epistemic Conditionals and the Ramsey Test. Synthese 91 (3):195-237.
Neil Tennant (2008). Belief-Revision, the Ramsey Test, Monotonicity, and the so-Called Impossibility Results. Review of Symbolic Logic 1 (4):402-423.
John N. Williams (2012). Moore-Paradoxical Belief, Conscious Belief and the Epistemic Ramsey Test. Synthese 188 (2):231-246.
Sarah-Jane Leslie (2008). 'If', 'Unless', and Quantification. In R. Stainton & C. Viger (eds.), Compositionality, Context, and Semantic Values.
Joseph Y. Halpern & Yoram Moses (1986). Taken by Surprise: The Paradox of the Surprise Test Revisited. [REVIEW] Journal of Philosophical Logic 15 (3):281 - 304.
Frank Döring (1997). The Ramsey Test and Conditional Semantics. Journal of Philosophical Logic 26 (4):359-376.
Added to index2009-03-16
Total downloads119 ( #33,029 of 1,911,306 )
Recent downloads (6 months)13 ( #45,245 of 1,911,306 )
How can I increase my downloads?