David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Law and Philosophy 31 (2):125-159 (2012)
This paper argues that, if we are committed to a Pro-choice stance with regard to selective abortion for disability, we will be unable to justify the prohibition of sex-selective abortion (SSA), for two reasons. First, familiar Pro-choice arguments in favour of a woman’s right to select against fetal impairment also support, by parity of reasoning, a right to choose SSA. Second, rejection of the criticisms of selective abortion for disability levelled by disability theorists also disposes, by implication, of the key objections to SSA, as developed, most notably, by feminists. The paper, then, consists of a conditional defence of SSA, under which SSA should be available, and protected by a right, if selective abortion for disability is. Opponents of SSA might respond by conceding additional restrictions on selection against disabled fetuses. It should become clear throughout the paper, however, that any such new restrictions would be unacceptably onerous for women
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Allen E. Buchanan, Dan W. Brock, Norman Daniels & Daniel Wikler (2000). From Chance to Choice. Cambridge University Press.
David Enoch & Andrei Marmor (2007). The Case Against Moral Luck. Law and Philosophy 26 (4):405-436.
P. Jones (1999). Group Rights and Group Oppression. Journal of Political Philosophy 7 (4):353–377.
F. M. Kamm (2007/2008). Intricate Ethics: Rights, Responsibilities, and Permissible Harm. New York ;Oxford University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Gail Weiss (1995). Sex-Selective Abortion: A Relational Approach. Hypatia 10 (1):202 - 217.
David F. Walbert (1973). Abortion, Society, and the Law. Cleveland [Ohio]Press of Case Western Reserve University.
Sonu Bedi (2011). Why a Criminal Prohibition on Sex Selective Abortions Amounts to a Thought Crime. Criminal Law and Philosophy 5 (3):349-360.
Simo Vehmas (2001). Response to “Abortion and Assent” by Rosamond Rhodes (CQ Vol 8, No 4) and “Abortion, Disability, Assent, and Consent” by Matti Häyry (CQ Vol 10, No 1) Assent and Selective Abortion: A Response to Rhodes and Häyry. [REVIEW] Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 10 (4):433-440.
Robert M. Baird & Stuart E. Rosenbaum (eds.) (2001). The Ethics of Abortion: Pro-Life Vs. Pro-Choice. Prometheus Books.
Carolyn Gonter, The Expressivist Argument, Prenatal Diagnosis, and Selective Abortion: An Appeal to the Social Construction of Disability.
Christopher L. Griffin Jr & Dov Fox, Disability-Selective Abortion and the Americans with Disabilities Act.
Farhat Moazam (2004). Feminist Discourse on Sex Screening and Selective Abortion of Female Foetuses. Bioethics 18 (3):205–220.
Mathew Lu (2011). Abortion and Virtue Ethics. In Stephen Napier (ed.), Persons, Moral Worth, and Embryos: A Critical Analysis of Pro-Choice Arguments. Springer.
Wendy Rogers, Angela Ballantyne & Heather Draper (2007). Is Sex-Selective Abortion Morally Justified and Should It Be Prohibited? Bioethics 21 (9):520–524.
N. Nobis (2011). Abortion, Metaphysics and Morality: A Review of Francis Beckwith's Defending Life: A Moral and Legal Case Against Abortion Choice. [REVIEW] Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 36 (3):261-273.
Sophia Isako Wong (2002). At Home with Down Syndrome and Gender. Hypatia 17 (3):89-117.
Added to index2011-08-13
Total downloads48 ( #48,599 of 1,696,506 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #79,559 of 1,696,506 )
How can I increase my downloads?