Sociobiology and philosophy of science
Biology and Philosophy 11 (2):271-281 (1996)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesCatherine Driscoll (2004). Can Behaviors Be Adaptations? Philosophy of Science 71 (1):16-35.
Ronald de Sousa (1990). The Sociology of Sociobiology. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 4 (3):271 – 283.
Arthur L. Caplan (1983). Book Review:Sociobiology and the Preemption of Social Science. Alexander Rosenberg; The Expanding Circle: Ethics and Sociobiology. Peter Singer. [REVIEW] Ethics 93 (3):603-.
Jason M. Byron (2005). Sociobiology. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Li Jianhui & Hong Fan (2003). Science as Ideology: The Rejection and Reception of Sociobiology in China. Journal of the History of Biology 36 (3):567 - 578.
Tamas Bereczkei (1993). An Intellectual Legacy of the Past: The Reception of Sociobiology in the East-European Countries. Biology and Philosophy 8 (4):399-407.
Michael Ruse (1987). Is Sociobiology a New Paradigm? Philosophy of Science 54 (1):98-104.
R. Paul Thompson (1980). Is Sociobiology a Pseudoscience? PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:363 - 370.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads9 ( #114,230 of 549,754 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
