Selling organs and souls: Should the state prohibit 'demeaning' practices? [Book Review]

Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 1 (1):27-31 (2004)
It is sometimes argued that practices such as organ-selling should be prohibited because they are demeaning to the individuals involved. In this article the plausibility of such an argument is questioned. I will examine what it means to demean or be demeaned, and suggest that the mere fact that an individual is demeaning themself does not provide sufficient justification for legal prohibition. On the contrary, such laws might be argued to be demeaning.
Keywords Kant  demeaning  autonomy  law
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF02448904
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 22,660
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
J. Harris (1997). "Goodbye Dolly?" The Ethics of Human Cloning. Journal of Medical Ethics 23 (6):353-360.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

26 ( #162,420 of 1,938,852 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

7 ( #83,956 of 1,938,852 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.