David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Kantian Review 15 (2):43-77 (2011)
This article examines where Kant stands on the question of the redistribution of wealth and income both nationally and globally. Kant is rightly seen as a radical reformer of the world order from a political standpoint seeking a republican, federative worldwide system; can he also be seen as wanting to bring about an equally dramatic shift from an economic perspective? To answer this question we have first of all to address the question of whether he is an egalitarian or an inegalitarian at the national level. Certainly there are certain social and material inequalities within a civil society Kant is prepared to accept and there are some he is not. This would imply that he would affirm certain inequalities at an international level and that there are others upon which he would recommend action. Thus the question arises as to whether or not it is appropriate for Kantians to regard the current enormous inequalities in wealth and income between individuals living in different parts of the globe as scandalous and in need of change. The paper throughout relates the problem of distributive justice within the state to the problem of distributive justice amongst states, arguing that this approach is warranted by Kant's own method. Particular attention is paid to how Kant's own approach to political philosophy may be deployed to underpin a change to a distinctive type of international distributive justice
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
John Rawls (1999). The Law of Peoples. Harvard University Press.
Arthur Ripstein (2009). Force and Freedom: Kant's Legal and Political Philosophy. Harvard University Press.
Allen W. Wood (2008). Kantian Ethics. Cambridge University Press.
Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1997). The Social Contract and Other Later Political Writings. Cambridge University Press.
Onora O'Neill (1986). Faces of Hunger: An Essay on Poverty, Justice, and Development. G. Allen & Unwin.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Re'em Segev (2008). The Distributive Justice Theory of Self-Defense: A Response to Whitley Kaufman. Ethics and International Affairs 22 (1).
Michael Reber (2010). Distributive Justice and Free Market Economics: A Eudaimonistic Perspective. Libertarian Papers 2.
Wei Xiaopin (2008). Distributive Justice, Injustice and Beyond Justice. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 50:857-872.
Sylvie Loriaux (2007). Kant on International Distributive Justice. Journal of Global Ethics 3 (3):281 – 301.
Chockalingam Viswesvaran & Deniz S. Ones (2002). Examining the Construct of Organizational Justice: A Meta-Analytic Evaluation of Relations with Work Attitudes and Behaviors. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 38 (3):193 - 203.
Shawna Gutfreund, Doing Justice Justice : Distinguishing Social Justice From Distributive Justice and the Implications for Bioethics.
Kevin T. Jackson (1993). Global Distributive Justice and the Corporate Duty to Aid. Journal of Business Ethics 12 (7):547 - 551.
Eric Rakowski (1991). Equal Justice. Oxford University Press.
Carl Knight & Zofia Stemplowska Carl (2011). Responsibility and Distributive Justice: An Introduction. In Carl Knight & Zofia Stemplowska (eds.), Responsibility and Distributive Justice. Oxford University Press
Thomas Morawetz (ed.) (1991). Justice. New York University Press.
Saul Smilansky (2006). Control, Desert and the Difference Between Distributive and Retributive Justice. Philosophical Studies 131 (3):511 - 524.
Jörgen Ödalen (2008). Rolling Out the Map of Justice. Distributor, Uppsala University Library.
David Miller (2007). National Responsibility and Global Justice. Oxford University Press.
Stéphane Chauvier (2002). Les principes de la justice distributive sont-ils applicables aux nations ? Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 1 (1):123-143.
Added to index2011-02-02
Total downloads165 ( #20,167 of 1,790,575 )
Recent downloads (6 months)33 ( #24,240 of 1,790,575 )
How can I increase my downloads?