David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Biology and Philosophy 16 (5):711-724 (2001)
Intelligent design theorist William Dembski has proposed an ``explanatory filter'' for distinguishing between events due to chance,lawful regularity or design. We show that if Dembski's filter were adopted as a scientific heuristic, some classical developments in science would not be rational, and that Dembski's assertion that the filter reliably identifies rarefied design requires ignoring the state of background knowledge. If background information changes even slightly, the filter's conclusion will vary wildly. Dembski fails to overcome Hume's objections to arguments from design.
|Keywords||Bayesian inference Darwin Dembski intelligent design natural selection|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Peter Olofsson (2008). Intelligent Design and Mathematical Statistics: A Troubled Alliance. Biology and Philosophy 23 (4):545-553.
Wesley Elsberry & Jeffrey Shallit (2011). Information Theory, Evolutionary Computation, and Dembski's "Complex Specified Information". Synthese 178 (2):237 - 270.
Ryan Nichold (2003). Scientific Content, Testability, and the Vacuity of Intelligent Design Theory. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 77 (4):591-611.
Branden Fitelson, Christopher Stephens & Elliott Sober (1999). Review: How Not to Detect Design. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 66 (3):472 - 488.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads23 ( #62,104 of 1,004,680 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,743 of 1,004,680 )
How can I increase my downloads?