David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Classical Quarterly 45 (01):58- (1995)
In a recent article, C. H. Kahn addresses an ‘old scholarly myth’, namely the idea that Book I of the Republic began life as an earlier, independent dialogue and was subsequently adapted to serve as a prelude to the much longer work that we know. The case for this hypothesis rests both on stylometric considerations and on the many ‘Socratic’ features that Book I, unlike the rest of the Republic, shares with Plato's earlier works. Having disposed of the positive arguments in favour of the ‘myth’, Kahn turns to the contrary—and in his view overwhelming—evidence that Book I was composed from the start as an integral part of the longer Republic. He catalogues 12 passages in Book I, accounting for roughly half its length, whose full significance will, he argues, only emerge if they are seen as instances of prolepsis, deliberate anticipations of what is to come in later books
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Rachel Barney (2006). Socrates' Refutation of Thrasymachus. In Gerasimos Xenophon Santas (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to Plato's Republic. Blackwell Pub..
Nils Rauhut, Thrasymachus. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Hanne Andrea Kraugerud (2010). 'Essentially Social'? A Discussion of the Spirited Part of the Soul in Plato. European Journal of Philosophy 18 (4):481-494.
Henry Dyson (2009). Prolepsis and Ennoia in the Early Stoa. Walter De Gruyter.
Mark Anderson (2006). Argumentative Norms in Republic I. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 13 (2):18-23.
P. P. Nicholson (1974). Unravelling Thrasymachus' Arguments in "The Republic". Phronesis 19 (3):210 - 232.
P. P. Nicholson (1974). Unravelling Thrasymachus' Arguments in"The Republic". Phronesis 19 (3):210-232.
George F. Hourani (1962). Thrasymachus' Definition of Justice in Plato's "Republic". Phronesis 7 (2):110 - 120.
George F. Hourani (1962). Thrasymachus' Definition of Justice in Plato's Republic. Phronesis 7 (1):110-120.
Leo Donald Davis (1970). The Arguments of Thrasymachus in the First Book of Plato's Republic. Modern Schoolman 47 (4):423-432.
William A. Welton (2006). Thrasymachus Vs. Socrates: What Counts as a Good Answer to the Question 'What is Justice'? (Republic 336b-9b). Apeiron 39 (4):293 - 317.
H. W. B. Joseph (1935/1971). Essays in Ancient and Modern Philosophy. Freeport, N.Y.,Books for Libraries Press.
Added to index2010-12-09
Total downloads13 ( #133,099 of 1,413,179 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #153,719 of 1,413,179 )
How can I increase my downloads?