David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Modern Theology 21 (4):575-585 (2005)
I shall confine my attention to the one Scotist doctrine that seems to be singled out as especially worrisome, the doctrine of univocity. In the first part of the paper I argue that the doctrine of univocity is true. So even if the doctrine has unwelcome consequences, we ought to affirm it anyway; it is not the job of the theologian or philosopher to shrink from uncomfortable truths. In the second part I argue further that the doctrine of univocity is salutary. That is, it does not have the deplorable consequences that have been attributed to it. It should be noted that by “consequences” I mean logical consequences. What historical consequences the doctrine may have had are beside the point: if people have been led astray by false inferences from the doctrine of univocity, the proper remedy is to correct their inferences, not to reject univocity.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Erline Jennifer Ashworth (1992). Analogy and Equivocation in Thirteenth-Century Logic: Aquinas in Context. Mediaeval Studies 54 (1):94-135.
Citations of this work BETA
Guus H. Labooy (2014). Duns Scotus’ Univocity: Applied to the Debate on Phenomenological Theology. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 76 (1):53-73.
Kevin L. Hughes (2005). The Ratio Dei and the Ambiguities of History. Modern Theology 21 (4):645-661.
Similar books and articles
Valerie Gray Hardcastle (1999). The Nontrivial Doctrine of Cognitive Neuroscience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):839-839.
Iii Get Checked Abstract Thomas J. Bole (1991). The Theoretical Tenability of the Doctrine of Double Effect. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (5).
Jonathan Kvanvig (1989). The Analogy Argument for a Limited Acccount of Omniscience. International Philosophical Quarterly 29 (2):129-138.
Arvind Sharma (1999). The Puruṣārthas: An Axiological Exploration of Hinduism. Journal of Religious Ethics 27 (2):223 - 256.
Lukáš Novák (2006). The Scotist Theory of Univocity. Studia Neoaristotelica 3 (1):17-27.
Nathan Widder (2001). The Rights of Simulacra: Deleuze and the Univocity of Being. [REVIEW] Continental Philosophy Review 34 (4):437-453.
Alison Hills (2007). Intentions, Foreseen Consequences and the Doctrine of Double Effect. Philosophical Studies 133 (2):257 - 283.
Giorgio Pini (2005). Scotus's Realist Conception of the Categories: His Legacy to Late Medieval Debates. Vivarium 43 (1):63-110.
Richard Cross (2008). Idolatry and Religious Language. Faith and Philosophy 25 (2):190-196.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads93 ( #46,984 of 1,934,535 )
Recent downloads (6 months)14 ( #39,145 of 1,934,535 )
How can I increase my downloads?