|Abstract||I shall confine my attention to the one Scotist doctrine that seems to be singled out as especially worrisome, the doctrine of univocity. In the first part of the paper I argue that the doctrine of univocity is true. So even if the doctrine has unwelcome consequences, we ought to affirm it anyway; it is not the job of the theologian or philosopher to shrink from uncomfortable truths. In the second part I argue further that the doctrine of univocity is salutary. That is, it does not have the deplorable consequences that have been attributed to it. It should be noted that by “consequences” I mean logical consequences. What historical consequences the doctrine may have had are beside the point: if people have been led astray by false inferences from the doctrine of univocity, the proper remedy is to correct their inferences, not to reject univocity.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||No categories specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Valerie Gray Hardcastle (1999). The Nontrivial Doctrine of Cognitive Neuroscience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):839-839.
Iii Get Checked Abstract Thomas J. Bole (1991). The Theoretical Tenability of the Doctrine of Double Effect. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (5).
Jonathan Kvanvig (1989). The Analogy Argument for a Limited Acccount of Omniscience. International Philosophical Quarterly 29 (2):129-138.
Arvind Sharma (1999). The Puruṣārthas: An Axiological Exploration of Hinduism. Journal of Religious Ethics 27 (2):223 - 256.
Lukáš Novák (2006). The Scotist Theory of Univocity. Studia Neoaristotelica 3 (1):17-27.
Nathan Widder (2001). The Rights of Simulacra: Deleuze and the Univocity of Being. Continental Philosophy Review 34 (4):437-453.
Alison Hills (2007). Intentions, Foreseen Consequences and the Doctrine of Double Effect. Philosophical Studies 133 (2):257 - 283.
Giorgio Pini (2005). Scotus's Realist Conception of the Categories: His Legacy to Late Medieval Debates. Vivarium 43 (1):63-110.
Richard Cross (2008). Idolatry and Religious Language. Faith and Philosophy 25 (2):190-196.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads17 ( #71,062 of 549,068 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #25,703 of 549,068 )
How can I increase my downloads?