David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Acta Analytica 25 (3):279-284 (2010)
J.J.C. Smart famously complained that rule utilitarianism is incoherent, and that rule utilitarians are guilty of rule worship . Much has been said about whether Smartâs complaint is justified, but I will assume for the sake of argument that Smart was on to something. Instead, I have three other goals. First, I want to show that Smartâs complaint is a specific instance of a more general objection to a moral theoryâwhat I will call the Incoherence Objection. Second, I want to illustrate how the Incoherence Objection can apply both to consequentialist and, surprisingly, some nonconsequentialist theories. Finally, I want to demonstrate at least one way nonconsequentialist theories that make use of rules, principles, and the like can dodge the Incoherence Objection
|Keywords||Utilitarianism Deontology Consequentialism Rules Moral theory|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Brad Hooker (2000). Ideal Code, Real World: A Rule-Consequentialist Theory of Morality. Oxford University Press.
Elijah Millgram (1997). Practical Induction. Harvard University Press.
David Lyons (1965). Forms and Limits of Utilitarianism. Oxford, Clarendon Press.
J. J. C. Smart (1956). Extreme and Restricted Utilitarianism. Philosophical Quarterly 6 (25):344-354.
Elijah Millgram (2003). Does the Categorical Imperative Give Rise to a Contradiction in the Will? Philosophical Review 112 (4):525-560.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Edward Stein (2005). Wide Reflective Equilibrium as an Answer to an Objection to Moral Heuristics. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):561-562.
Attila Tanyi (2012). The Case for Authority. In S. Schleidgen (ed.), Should we always act morally? Essays on Overridingness. Tectum 159-189.
Alastair Wilson (2012). Objective Probability in Everettian Quantum Mechanics. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 64 (4):axs022.
Christopher Michael Cloos (2009). The Evidential Weight of Considered Moral Judgments. Dissertation, San Jose State University
Andre Kukla (1995). Is There a Logic of Incoherence? International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 9 (1):59 – 71.
Dale E. Miller (2011). Mill, Rule Utilitarianism, and the Incoherence Objection. In Ben Eggleston, Dale E. Miller & D. Weinstein (eds.), John Stuart Mill and the Art of Life. Oxford University Press 94.
Richard Fumerton (1994). The Incoherence of Coherence Theories. Journal of Philosophical Research 19:89-102.
Ben Eggleston (2010). Rules and Their Reasons : Mill on Morality and Instrumental Rationality. In Ben Eggleston, Dale E. Miller & D. Weinstein (eds.), John Stuart Mill and the Art of Life. Oxford University Press
Timothy Chappell (2007). Integrity and Demandingness. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 10 (3):255 - 265.
Added to index2010-06-30
Total downloads30 ( #103,974 of 1,725,584 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #110,407 of 1,725,584 )
How can I increase my downloads?