The Nature of Universals and of Abstractions
The Monist 41 (4):583-593 (1931)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,664 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJohn Bolender (2006). Nomic Universals and Particular Causal Relations: Which Are Basic and Which Are Derived? Philosophia 34 (4):405-410.
John Bigelow & Robert Pargetter (1989). Vectors and Change. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 40 (3):289-306.
Richard Levins (2006). Strategies of Abstraction. Biology and Philosophy 21 (5):741-755.
Charles Landesman (1971). The Problem of Universals. New York,Basic Books.
Michael J. Loux (ed.) (1970/1976). Universals and Particulars: Readings in Ontology. University of Notre Dame Press.
D. M. Armstrong (1982). Laws of Nature as Relations Between Universals and as Universals. Philosophical Topics 13 (1):7-24.
Paweł Rojek (2008). Three Trope Theories. Axiomathes 18 (3):359-377.
Theodore Sider (2006). Bare Particulars. Philosophical Perspectives 20 (1):387–397.
David M. Johnson (1990). Can Abstractions Be Causes? Biology and Philosophy 5 (1):63-77.
Ingvar Johansson (2009). Proof of the Existence of Universals—and Roman Ingarden's Ontology. Metaphysica 10 (1):65-87.
Max Kistler (2005). Necessary Laws. In Jan Faye, Paul Needham, Uwe Scheffler & Max Urchs (eds.), Nature’s Principles. Springer.
J. Robert G. Williams (2007). The Possibility of Onion Worlds: Rebutting an Argument for Structural Universals. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 85 (2):193 – 203.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2011-01-09Total downloads5 ( #160,239 of 549,007 )Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,272 of 549,007 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
