David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy Compass 4 (5):813-821 (2009)
Global migration raises important ethical issues. One of the most significant is the question of whether liberal democratic societies have strong moral obligations to admit immigrants. Historically, most philosophers have argued that liberal states are morally free to restrict immigration at their discretion, with few exceptions. Recently, however, liberal egalitarians have begun to challenge this conventional view in two lines of argument. The first contends that immigration restrictions are inconsistent with basic liberal egalitarian values, including freedom and moral equality. The second maintains that affluent, liberal democratic societies are morally obligated to admit immigrants as a partial response to global injustices, such as poverty and human rights violations. This article surveys the main philosophical arguments for these positions on immigration and discusses the critical responses to these arguments.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Thomas Pogge (2005). World Poverty and Human Rights. Ethics and International Affairs 19 (1):1–7.
Peter Singer (1972). Famine, Affluence, and Morality. Philosophy and Public Affairs 1 (3):229-243.
Joseph H. Carens (1992). Migration and Morality: A Liberal Egalitarian Perspective. In Brian Barry & Robert E. Goodin (eds.), Free Movement: Ethical Issues in the Transnational Migration of People and of Money. University of Pennsylvania Press 25-47.
Norman Daniels (1985). Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality. [REVIEW] Philosophical Review 94 (1):142-148.
Charles R. Beitz (1983). Cosmopolitan Ideals and National Sentiment. Journal of Philosophy 80 (10):591-600.
Citations of this work BETA
Michael Blake (2014). The Right to Exclude. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 17 (5):521-537.
Sarah Fine (2013). The Ethics of Immigration: Self‐Determination and the Right to Exclude. Philosophy Compass 8 (3):254-268.
Stephanie J. Silverman (2014). Detaining Immigrants and Asylum Seekers: A Normative Introduction. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 17 (5):600-617.
Similar books and articles
Arash Abizadeh (2006). Liberal Egalitarian Arguments for Closed Borders: Some Preliminary Critical Reflections. Ethics & Economics 4 (1).
Matthew Lister (2010). Immigration, Association, and the Family. Law and Philosophy 29 (6):717-745.
John Exdell (2009). Immigration, Nationalism, and Human Rights. Metaphilosophy 40 (1):131-146.
Mathias Risse (2008). On the Morality of Immigration. Ethics and International Affairs 22 (1):25–33.
Alex Sager (2007). Culture and Immigration. Social Philosophy Today 23:69-86.
Christopher Heath Wellman & Phillip Cole (2011). Debating the Ethics of Immigration: Is There a Right to Exclude? OUP Usa.
Brian M. Stern (2005). Immigration Restriction in a Liberal Democracy. Social Philosophy Today 21:125-135.
Arash Abizadeh (2010). Closed Borders, Human Rights, and Democratic Legitimation. In David Hollenbach (ed.), Driven From Home: Human Rights and the New Realities of Forced Migration. Georgetown University Press
Sune Lægaard (2010). What is the Right to Exclude Immigrants? Res Publica 16 (3):245-262.
Added to index2009-07-21
Total downloads216 ( #12,874 of 1,907,521 )
Recent downloads (6 months)23 ( #29,655 of 1,907,521 )
How can I increase my downloads?